ARCHITECTURE
lWaiting rooms
solved by creating a new access point to the building for patients through the new outpatient service building, generating a direct connection between the buildings. The radiotherapy and diagnostic
Access Radiotherapy
Palliative care and urology
Radiotherapy Sample collection
Diagnostic imaging
The waiting areas for visitors to the six buildings.
the waiting rooms of the various services located therein. Specifically, the INC has three main
problems. On the first floor the problems related to the location of the waiting rooms. The first problem arises on the waiting
rooms of the palliative care and urology rooms, located in the heritage building, which are mixed with the administrative services. Additionally, they are not located near the outpatients’ access point and it is necessary to travel a long way to reach that area. The problem can be solved by building the new outpatient service building, in which these rooms are accommodated, giving administrative specialistion to this area and gathering these outpatients in the new building. A second problem is the sample
collection service waiting room. Again this is a long way from the outpatients area. A solution has been found by transferring this service to the new outpatient service building, additionally, this service is
The interior design was intended to be solved in a comprehensive manner, according to the expectations of functionality
provided as a temporary construction which must be demolished in order to create the green communications axis of the landscaping project explained above. The third problem relates to access to
the nuclear medicine building, which also crosses between the public and restricted circulation pathways, due to the building and the access point. This problem can be
Nuclear medicine
imaging waiting rooms have a better location and a direct relationship with the patients’ access point, but have the problem of congestion due the number of people which these services can serve. We are aware that it is not easy for the
implementation of this Master Plan to relocate services or waiting rooms, due to the consolidation and difficult transfer or internal modification of the same. But, this matter has been solved with the selection of the services that need to be transferred to the new outpatient service building, therefore gathering outpatients.
Heritage building The design of the rearrangement under the direction of Consorcio GALEZ consortium and the architecture of Julia Galán Gómez, is part of the Master Plan, intending for the building to be exclusively administrative. It currently contains other services such as research, a pain clinic and some outpatient care rooms. These hinder the development of all the administrative activities, mixing the circulation of patients with the circulation of administrative staff. The interior design was intended to
be solved in a comprehensive manner, according to the expectations of functionality. The first task here was recognition of the property, which possesses qualities of historical testimony and aesthetic value from modern architecture. We studied the original plans for the building which was created in 1934. The values that the building represents
Second floor First floor
today are not the same patriotic values it possessed when it was built, as the function for which it was originally built no longer exists. It does possess a value of cultural memory, and the project is inclined towards the concept of the value of the building. We needed to define what to conserve, in order to establish how to conserve it. Based on this concept, the intervention focused on adapting the interior of the building towards greater functionality, modifying, conserving, recovering and preserving the building as a system non-susceptible to modification. For this purpose, we opted to recover
Main façade n Aggregate free n Service areas n Conformation areas n Emergency staircases The plans for the Heritage building. 62 Third floor
the volumetrics and the original existing facades, intervening only in areas which had suffered from inadequate additions or where intervention had erased the originality of the building. In conclusion, the three aspects
mentioned above – landscaping, specialisation of each building and the heritage building – form part of the master plan that has been performed at the National Institute of Cancer.
IFHE IFHE DIGEST 2017
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80
