Roger McGough CBE, is a poet who is known both for his work for adults and for children. He is a keen supporter of new writing and in 2014 and 2015 has been chairing the judging panel for the Centre for Literacy in Primary Education (CLPE) Poetry Award. This is the only award for published children’s poetry in the UK and it has been an annual award since 2003. Roger was the winner of the award in 2004 and 2005.
In this article Roger talks to CLPE Chief Executive, Louise Johns-Shepherd about the award, the judging process and contemporary children’s poetry.
L J-S: We were delighted at CLPE when you decided to chair the judging panel for the award in 2014 and again this year. Why did you agree to become involved in the award?
R McG: Well, first of all, having been a previous winner, I was interested in the process. Over the years I have judged adult awards (I’m judging the Bridport Poetry Prize at the moment), a serious undertaking because I take sole responsibility, but the CLiPPA, although a labour of love, is much more fun. It is very satisfying to be able to share your thoughts with a group of judges, to discuss the entries and make a case for them. As well as this, judging the award keeps you in touch with what is going on and what is being published at the moment. You come across new voices and meet old friends and familiar voices. And if you read other poetry you expand your own experience, so I love it from that point of view as well.
L J-S: This year, the award has been re-named and we’re calling it The CLiPPA (Centre for Literacy in Primary Poetry Award). You invented that name didn’t you?
R McG: I did, didn’t I? I want this award to be memorable, and to have a memorable name. The Centre for Literacy in Primary Education Poetry Award isn’t exactly catchy. CLiPPA sounds appealing and popular. If we’re going to highlight the importance of children’s poetry then we need to have a name that people can remember – and say!
L J-S: And we love it, it has really taken off. Thank you. You’ve got some fantastic fellow judges this year (Allie Esiri, Tony Bradman, Charlotte Hacking and last year’s winner Tony Mitton). These are all smart and knowledgeable people. When the judges all come together what is your process as chair, how do you keep everyone in order and how do you come to a decision?
R McG: I start from the premise that all the judges have read all of the books and will come with their favourites already in their
14 Books for Keeps No.213 July 2015
heads. We have an in depth discussion about everyone’s shortlist and take the time to really talk about the books that stood out to each person. I don’t go in knowing what I think will win, but I go in knowing what I like. The judges are never dogmatic and the art of persuasion can change minds. Debates are lively and well- informed with everyone having their say – we may disagree, but it is all very amicable in the end and everyone enjoys themselves.
L J-S: What is the best thing about judging?
R McG: The best thing is that you get to read new poems – from new poets that you may not have seen before – or from poets on their third or fourth book. Poems that surprise you, or delight you. It’s also great when you read things that are different, see a collection by a single poet or an anthology that is truly original or innovative or come across a book which is beautiful in its writing and production.
L J-S: What is the worst thing?
R McG: That people will inevitably be disappointed. We discuss a book by a good friend which I know will not be a winner. Everyone who is nominated in this award has been published and every book will have a good poem in it but sometimes there are things in there that dissuade you. It may be that there are too many poems on a particular or tired theme (dragons or teachers stick in my mind) or illustrations that are drowned by the text.
L J-S: What do you think makes this an important award and why do you think publishing contemporary children’s poetry is important?
R McG: My first poems I assumed, were adult poems – I wrote for myself or my peers. It was not until later I realised that I was writing for younger people and children as well. Poetry develops imagination, we know it helps children learn to read and they love it. Children like familiarity, and a poem that you can remember breeds that familiarity. Reading a poem can be less taxing than a whole book, you get to the end quicker – but it still stimulates the imagination and plays little films inside your head that make
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32