“...WHILE WE TAKE OUR WORK VERY SERIOUSLY, WE DON’T TAKE OURSELVES TOO SERIOUSLY. ”


TS: And can you tell me a bit about choosing Into the Woods? Because, up to this point, it’s been primarily Shakespeare, correct?


BS: That’s right. Musicals are usually written, directed, and staged with a certain kind of hierarchy in terms of the rehearsal process, and so we thought it would be interesting to see what it would be like to bring our process of making a show to a musical. We very quickly came up with Into the Woods as the show that would be the perfect fit for us because it met so many of the criteria that we have when picking a show. It had to have lots of great parts (because we are a company of actors), and it had to be about something that we care about. It is such a compelling story, and there’s all kinds of amazing theatrical challenges in it: how are you going to do the wolf? How are you going to do the giant? How are you going to tell this story with this number of people in the cast? How are you going to make all these musical events happen? To pick a line from the show that we’ve often quoted, it made us “excited and scared,” and that’s something that we look for.


TS: I read in a few interviews that you think the piece is about inheritance. Is that what you would still say it’s about?


NB: Well, I think it’s about multiple things. But, the idea of inheritances runs so strongly throughout the show, and it was very useful as one of our organizing principles. There are objects that we inherit from our parents and our grandparents, and they can take on great value. Mundane objects can take on a totemic power when they have a story or a past to them. But those inheritances can also be things like curses. They can be ideas. Family stories. Expectations.


TS: And when you say “inheritance,” I’m sure DNA is part of that, too.


BS: That’s exactly right. I think that one of the reasons that we’ve all connected to this story on a personal level, is that we are at the age where we have both parents and children. In all previous points


in our lives, we would always see ourselves on the young side. Now, we find ourselves identifying just as much with the parental issues that are in the play as we do with the kids’ point of view.


TS: How do you go about casting yourselves since you are also the co-directors?


NB: In the case of Into the Woods, we thought that Ben and Jessie would be a great pairing as Baker and Baker’s Wife because of their temperaments, their voice ranges, and the acting challenges. Sometimes the casting creates interesting doubling or tripling opportunities that the actors will appreciate but will also resonate with the message of the production. In the case of Into the Woods, Andy


and I play the Princes, but we also double as the stepsisters and each play an animal. What we ended up finding was an interesting duo act that is throughout the production. It’s a bit of complicated math, but we’re thinking artistically and creatively as well as like a traditional casting director.


TS: Did you watch other productions as research? Did you reread the original Grimm stories?


BS: As an actor and director, I prefer not to see other people’s interpretations. I had seen the PBS video as a kid, but once we found out we were doing this production, I never went back to that as a reference.


NB: Like Ben, I prefer not to view other productions so I can have an authentic response to the material as opposed to anyone else’s interpretation. I purchased the Brothers Grimm stories and went back and reread all of the tales that pertained to Into the Woods.


TS: Did any changes have to be made in the score or in the libretto for the ten- person version?


BS: Here’s what I’ll say: we made a very, very small number of changes. We never intended to do anything except Into the Woods as written. Almost nothing about the score has changed, and we altered very little about the book. The goal is to make it feel like we’re just doing the show, but those who know the story intimately will recognize that we have tweaked a couple of events in the show.


TS: Will you please talk about collaborating with the design team and how the show will manifest itself visually?


NB: When we started talking with Derek McLane, our set designer, we knew we weren’t interested in having trees represent the woods. And we were interested in a space where all the


physical objects that represent inheritances could coexist with a piano, since we knew one would be at the center of the production. Derek took that and came up with this idea of expanding and exploding the piano so that the entire production, in some sense, was happening inside the piano. Upstage he has these layers of string that are evocative of the woods. On the sides of the stage are piano harps that are the guts of the piano and are incredibly tactile and evocative as well. He took our soup of ideas and worked that into a magnificent design.


TS: And how about working with Whitney and Darron?


BS: With Whitney, it was different because she has designed costumes for every Fiasco production. We have easy shorthand with her, and


INTO THE WOODS UPSTAGE GUIDE 5


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24