This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
INDUSTRY ARTICLE


Figure 2a and 2b: The wind profile maps wind velocity (x-axis in m/sec) at various heights (y-axis in metres). At a height of roughly 100 metres, the measured data (black line) show a visible blip, with wind speeds increasing drastically from that height. The zone below is marked by high turbulence intensity caused by the trees in the forest. Turbulence intensity is considerably weaker in the zone above, where the air flow is largely uninfluenced by trees and topography.


Mean turbulence intensity at a height of 140 m is 10.4 per cent. This relatively low turbulence intensity is important for the design and construction and thus the structural stability of the wind turbines. However, at lower levels, the complex topography and particularly the trees, cause a drastic increase in turbulence intensity.


TREES CAUSE TURBULENCE


Turbulence is a typical feature of forest areas, as wind that passes over trees in its path will swirl violently near ground level. The wind profile reflects this phenomenon, showing a visible blip at a measurement height of around 100 metres.


This height is an important design criterion for the projected wind turbines, which must be designed to harness the wind above the zone of wind turbulence and withstand the turbulence intensity prevailing at the site. Based on the measured data, the experts further determined the preliminary reference yield – an important tool for estimating the possible future energy output. The reference yield is calculated in comparison to a reference site with a reference yield of 100 %, i.e. an average site with favourable wind conditions on the coast of northern Germany.


The measurements in the Upper Palatinate region, carried out after one year of operation, revealed a reference yield of around 94 per cent. The site’s viability is thus comparable to that of a high-wind site near the coast in northern Germany. In the second year of operation this result is to be verified and statistically validated.


The measurements also showed major variance over the course of the year.


www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


7


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116