C A R T IE R
LOT 5 A FINE & UNIQUE SOLID GOLD CARTIER PARIS POCKET WATCH ‘AND THE FLOCKS WILL NOT FEAR THE GREAT LIONS’ CASE DECORATED BY
I.ROUKHOMOVSKY, REF. 1509 CIRCA 1900 D: Silver engine turned dial with applied Roman numerals, blue steel Breguet hands, subsidiary seconds. M: Keyless wind lever movement. C: Case back decorated with a scene in relief depicting utopian peace, a sheep playing with a lion, a child playing with a snake, a mother nursing, all weapons are broken and discarded while a wise man looks on from above against a sunset in the background, the top of the case back is is embossed with a motto from Virgil’s Forth Eclogue “ Nec magnos metuent armenta leones” (And the Flocks Will not Fear the Great Lions) signed Cartier Paris and by the artist
I.Roukhomovsky, front bezel chased with stars, case diameter measures approx. 48mm, excluding the neck & bow.
In the 1890s an exceptionally rare and beautiful object appeared in Paris. It was a gold tiara, ostensibly having belonged to the Scythian King Saitapharnes 3rd-2nd century BC. Legend has it that Saitapharnes, who was besieging the Greek colony of Olbia was offered tribute and gifts in exchange for leaving the city in peace. The tiara was said to be one of those gifts. Made in solid gold and weighing, incredibly, one pound, it was a masterpiece of the goldsmith’s craft. Its appearance on the Paris art market stirred a great deal of excitement and it instantly became a subject of rivalry and controversy. The Baron de Rothschild was determined to buy it if the Louvre did not. The Louvre Museum did finally purchase it, for the huge sum of 200,000 gold francs about $4,500,000 in today’s money. It drew many visitors to the museum and was the subject of much discussion in art circles. Then, in 1903, allegations came to light that the tiara was not authentic, and had, indeed been made only a short time before. This of course stirred a great commotion and Prof. Clermont-Ganneau from the College de France was entrusted with the inquiry. To make a rather convoluted story shorter, Clermont-Ganneau learned that a Russian goldsmith from Odessa, named Israel Roukhomovsky, might have been the real creator of the tiara. Roukhomovsky was brought to Paris from Odessa and testified that he had made the tiara in good faith for a dealer who paid him 2000 rubles, claiming that it was for a present. In proof of his testimony, Roukhomovsky was provided with materials and proceeded to reproduce one of the scenes on the crown before the very eyes of Clermont-Ganneau. The Professor, amazed, saw beyond a shadow of a doubt that Roukhomovsky was the artist who had made the tiara. Embarrassed, the museum placed the object in storage while the press gloated over the scandal. However, the int rest stirred by the controversy drew many visitors - on some days as many as 30,000, and thus the money spent for the tiara was perhaps not completely wasted after all. As for Roukhomovsky, he became a famous goldsmith of legendary skill. Louis Cartier, like many others, must have been fascinated by the story and by Roukhomovsky’s exceptional skills and commissioned at least one object from him - the present watch. This is an element of the history of Cartier that has been unknown till now, and highlights both the work of Roukhomovsky, very scarce, as well as the subtle taste of Cartier. Roukhomovsky Mozyr, Lithuania 1860 - 1934 Paris also spelled Rouchomovsky, Rouchoumowski, etc. (rf. See page 172). £34,000-£38,000
8 64 KNI G H T S BR I D GE S W1X 7J F w w w.w at c h e s o fk n i g ht sb r i d g e . c om
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180