Briefi ng


07 •


fi tfor


Their introduction sparked controversy but it’s hoped planned reforms will resolve doctors’ concerns about the often maligned fi t note


T


O some GPs it seemed little more than double-speak when in April 2010 the traditional ‘sick note’ yielded to the much more proactive-sounding ‘fi t note’. But in reality this represented much


more than just a simple name change. Gone now are the old Med 3 and Med 5 forms to sign off patients from


work, replaced by a single revised Med 3 Statement of Fitness for Work. GPs consulting with a patient off work for more than seven days must tick a box indicating that the patient is either “not fi t for work” or “fi t for work taking account of the following advice”. And this second option includes more tick boxes judging whether the patient might benefi t from a phased return to work and/or altered hours, amended duties or workplace adaptations. The form then invites comments on the “functional eff ects” of the patient’s condition. Needless to say the introduction of ‘fi t notes’ was not without


controversy. Among concerns was that GPs might be drawn into giving opinions beyond their clinical competency. MDDUS adviser Dr Susan Gibson-Smith said at the time: “GPs are not experts in occupational health medicine and we would caution against giving anything other than the most general recommendations for alteration to work place conditions.” There were also worries over the added time involved and how eff ective GPs could really be in getting patients back to work. But the political will behind the


changes was strong given that in the UK an estimated 300,000 people each year fall out of work and into the benefi ts systems because of health-related issues. Sickness absence is estimated to cost the UK economy £15 billion each year. The Government believes that GPs are well-placed to help deal with the problem. So how eff ective are fi t notes?


take a critical look at sickness absence in Great Britain and in January of this year the Government published its response to the report: Health at Work – an independent review of sickness absence. Among major recommendations made in the report and accepted by the Government is the creation of a health and work assessment and advisory service to deliver a state-funded assessment by occupational health professionals for employees after four weeks on sick leave. This should relieve pressure on GPs in more long-term problematic cases requiring greater expertise in occupational health. The Government has also agreed to revise existing DWP fi t note


guidance for GPs and doctors to ensure that judgments about fi tness to work move away from job-specifi c assessments. This in part arose out of concerns that GPs were being expected to provide advice on a patient’s suitability to perform specifi c tasks at work. The response paper states: “We do not expect GPs to be workplace experts – employers and employees are best placed to make decisions about how the advice in the fi t note could translate into changes to their specifi c jobs and workplaces.” It is also recognised that GPs need more support to improve


“ GPs will be able to refer complex cases of sickness absence in the same way as they can seek specialist health advice”


In a survey conducted in 2011 on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), 61 per cent of GPs agreed that fi t notes had improved the quality of their discussions with patients about return to work and 70 per cent agreed that fi t notes helped their patients make a phased return to work.


But the GPs surveyed also expressed frustration when it came to dealing with more diffi cult cases, particularly involving mental health issues. Only around 20 per cent of GPs agreed that there were good services locally to which they could refer their patients for either advice or support in returning to work, with 17 per cent uncertain if any such services were available locally. Defi ciencies in training were also uncovered with 89 per cent of GPs reporting that they had not received training in health and work within the past 12 months. In 2011, Dame Carol Black and David Frost CBE were commissioned to


knowledge and awareness of the benefi ts system including information about Work Capability Assessments (WCAs). The DWP has already produced a guide to the benefi ts system for GPs and this will be further updated to coincide with current welfare reform. In addition the RCGP off ers a half-day workshop developed in partnership with the DWP and designed to increase the knowledge, skills and confi dence of GPs in dealing with clinical issues relating to work and health and ensure GPs are aware of their


responsibilities in regard to fi tness to work. There are also online resources for GPs (www.healthyworkinguk.co.uk). The Government response to the Black report has been by and large


welcomed. Dame Carol Black commented: “Far too many people with potentially manageable conditions - like stress or back pain - are eff ectively being signed off work for life, sliding from a short spell of sickness absence to a life of long-term benefi t dependency. The changes being made by the government today will begin to change that.” Leicestershire GP and occupational health expert Dr Rob Hampton is also supportive of the move as he said on the GPonline website: “At last GPs will be able to refer complex cases of sickness absence in the same way as they can seek specialist healthcare advice for their patients.”


Jim Killgore is publications editor at MDDUS


FIT NOTES?


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16