July 2012 Court Decision FROM PAGE 1


people to buy insurance or be penalized was not tantamount, as dissenting Justice Antonin Scalia argued, to compelling citizens to buy broccoli for their health. Instead, says the majority, the penalty for not purchasing health insurance is no different from any other federal tax permitted by the U.S. Constitution.


The Chief Justice, however, sided


with his four conservative colleagues on the administration’s primary argument calling on them to uphold the individual mandate under the commerce clause of the Constitution as federally protected interstate commerce.


This highly controversial part


of the decision by the conservative justices throws into question 70 years of Supreme Court decisions affirming the government’s right to regulate interstate trade on such concerns as product safety, the clean air act and some worry the 1964 Civil Rights Act.. Seemingly obscure to most Americans, it was hotly argued by the White House and public advocates. But on this issue the five conservatives prevailed.


Even though, as ACA advocates


asserted, factors determining health care costs are national and don’t stop at a state’s borders, health insurance, usually regulated by states, is a states-rights matter not subject to federal control. This part of the decision – although not in the headlines now – is likely to have a huge ripple effect on issues unrelated to health care.


Vote Limiting Medicaid Expansion The court’s decision may well


trigger long-term problems for lower-income, uninsured people in some states. The court voted* that the federal government can expand the Medicaid program when the full law goes into effect in 2014. But if state political leaders don’t want the new program and its rules for covering people adequately, the United States government cannot threaten to withhold payments they already receive or existing Medicaid services.


Although the ACA will now move


ahead with the aim of covering about 31 million uninsured people, about 17 million are supposed to be covered under state-run Medicaid plans. Some experts believe that even staunch GOP governors and legislatures won’t pass up the generous payments to states set


www.hamptonroadsmessenger.com


by the law. Under the ACA, the federal government will pick up 100 percent of the cost of newly insured people for the first few years and 90 percent after that. But others aren’t so sure.


For very low-income people in


the Medicaid program, the federal government sets minimum rules for what a state has to cover and pays from 50-70 percent of the costs, with poorer states, such as Mississippi, receiving the larger subsidy. But states have had a lot of leeway to restrict eligibility rules, such as according to what illnesses people have or how severely impaired they are. Recession-strapped states have also been able to limit access to care, such as twisting a cap on how many prescriptions a patient needs at a time, regardless of their need or physician’s orders.


With the ACA, anyone now unable


to get coverage need only show that his or her income is below 133 percent of the federal poverty line, that is, just a little above being the poorest of the poor. Under the Supreme Court’s decision, though, some health care advocates are asking whether, for instance, the 26 states with Republican governors — the same states who sued the Obama administration, partly leading to the Supreme Court’s decision — could simply ignore the ACA’s Medicaid provision.


Others speculate that few if any


states will decline such rich funding to provide vulnerable citizens with health care.


Impact on Multiethnic Communities The ACA’s complications will be


entangled in intense debate through the November election and beyond. But for now, health care advocates are counting the law’s blessings to date.


The American Public Health


Association, for example, noted in praising the decision that already:


54 million U.S. families have


additional benefits, including greater access to preventive health care services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, such as vaccines and preventive care and screenings for women;


2.5 million young adults up to


age 26 are able to stay on their parents’ health insurance plans;


Nearly 18 million children with


pre-existing conditions are protected from insurance coverage denials;


3.6 million seniors received 50 Scholarship Watch


Discus Awards National All-Around Student Scholarship Award Amount: $2,000


Number of Annual Awards: 10


When most people think of college scholarships, they are usually thinking of a meteoric GPA or a fantastic win-loss record on a big sports team. Not the Discus Awards.


Discus Awards scholarships recognize leaders on the dance team, drywall hangers supporting Habitat for Humanity, shift leaders at Starbucks, active youth group members, and social media gurus. Put simply, Discus Awards Scholarships recognize a new category of high school students: the all-around standout. Sound like you or a student you know?


Whether you’re a high school athlete, Mathlete, or poet, the Discus Awards have


athletic, academic, or art scholarships for you. These student scholarships give you the means to continue fueling your talents and passions.


To be eligible for a Discus Award, students must be U.S. citizens or legal residents in 9th, 10th, 11th, or 12th grade. Every Discus Award winner is eligible for scholarship consideration.


Discus Award winners are the founders of local businesses, leaders of non-profit organizations, stars of town sports teams, and advanced scholars. In addition to receiving recognition, every Discus Award winner is automatically considered by a judging panel each month for a $2,000 college scholarship. The winner of the National All-Around Student Scholarship is announced on the last weekday of each month of the school year, September through June, on the Discus Awards Facebook Page.


The final deadline to apply for a 2012-2013 National All-Around Student Scholarship is May 31, 2013 at 11:59 p.m. ET.


Apply online at www.discusawards.com/scholarship-info Visit hamptonroadsmessenger.com for a list of 50 scholarships Tell us about your


Church programs Churches@hamptonroadsmessenger.com


The Hampton Roads Messenger 11


percent discounts on their drugs in 2011 as an initial step in closing the “donut hole”; and


Almost 33 million seniors accessed


preventive services now available without cost-sharing through Medicare.


Kathy Lim Ko, president and


CEO of the Asian and Pacific Islander American Health Forum, issued a statement hailing the decision and calling ACA a “landmark civil rights law that brings the work of equity and justice to the health arena.”


Ko noted that through


implementation of ACA’s early provisions, “97,000 Asian American and Pacific Islander young adults have been able to remain on their parent’s insurance plans and nearly 3 million Asian Americans have received preventive health care at no cost. By 2016, an estimated 2 million Asian Americans will have gained or become eligible for coverage.”


At the Greenlining Institute, a


multiethnic policy nonprofit, General Counsel Samuel S. Kang, stated, “Every day we wrestle with the reality that African Americans, Asian Americans and Latinos are less likely to have health insurance than whites, and the Affordable Care Act is already helping to fix this massive problem.”


In California, Kang said in a release, over a million people have


already benefited from the law, including 400,000 low-income earners.


Health Care Gaps Remain In the long run, however, the 2,700


pages of the Affordable Care Act and the 200 pages of interpretation — majority and dissenting — added by the Supreme Court, leaves “a substantial gap between the diagnosis of America’s medical problems and the remedies the White House and Congress could agree to,” according to Yale professor emeritus Theodore Marmor, among the leading health policy authorities in the country.


Although ACA’s mosaic of “bits


and pieces” of reform undeniably benefits many, the measure fails to create a coherent national health care policy within a system of continuity of care, fails to establish long-term care for elders and those with disabilities, and fails to control health care spending in a system now costing double that of countries having significantly better health outcomes than the U.S.


For today, though, most health


care advocates would concur with the statement of APHA Executive Director Georges C. Benjamin, MD. The Supreme Court’s decision, he said, “marks tremendous progress towards reshaping our health system into one that saves the lives of at least 44,000 people who die annually simply because they do not have health insurance that could keep them healthy.”


Need help with


your bottom line? Advertise in the


Hampton Roads Messenger Call (757) 575-1863


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16