Ensuring quality and professionalism
Trips abroad for dental care tend to be most economically viable when involving fairly extensive treatment such as implants. Admittedly, adverse outcomes in relation to treatment of this complexity are not unknown in the UK. However, such clinical complications are arguably less likely in this country because the GDC operates a stringently policed register of specialists and censures registrants who do not work within their scope of competence. Numerous obligations restricting the administration of intravenous sedation in anxious patients also apply in the UK, and general anaesthesia is simply not permitted in general practice. Such controls are not guaranteed outside the UK and the degree of regulation in some countries is variable and oſten difficult to research. Websites such as Health Regulation
Worldwide offer some insights into the professional bodies that oversee dentistry in other countries but it would appear that there is no umbrella organisation which offers comprehensive assistance to patients who wish to satisfy themselves that their treatment abroad will be efficient and safe. An overseas dentist may lack the experience or qualifications that would be required in the UK and this could lead to an unsuccessful or even a harmful outcome. Patients seeking compensation in another country might find that their legal position is very difficult to establish. Even if the relevant legal system is understood, pursuing a claim in negligence in another country will undoubtedly have logistical and financial implications.
has been completed. Even if an agreement is secured with
regard to all dental charges, multi-stage treatment or unforeseen complications may necessitate a longer stay or return visits, incurring additional costs and possibly loss of earnings. Terefore, patients who are initially attracted by the potential discounts frequently quoted in the popular press and website testimonials must remember to factor contingencies such as these into their financial calculations.
SPRING 2012
Remedial work in the UK Another common question is to what extent a UK dentist is responsible for rectifying failed work which has been carried out abroad. Faced with such a case, most practitioners will feel a degree of empathy with their patient’s plight. However, in such instances, the UK dentist is not required to bear any of the costs of remedial work. In fact, correcting unsuccessful dentistry is oſten more complex than carrying it out in the first place and practitioners must not, through some misplaced sense of obligation, involve themselves in work that is beyond their ability.
“Correcting unsuccessful dentistry is often more complex than carrying it out in the first place”
Instead, the presenting condition must
be carefully assessed and scrupulously recorded, making use of photographs and justifiable radiographs where applicable, before a written estimate is given for work which the dentist feels will be beneficial. At this stage, it is up to the patient to decide whether to proceed on this basis or return to the dentist who provided the original treatment. Te advice thus far, while perfectly valid,
does tend to reinforce the stereotypical view that standards of care and professionalism in other countries lag behind those of the UK. Yet, to endorse this position without qualification is to disregard the many excellent courses of treatments which are received by UK patients in European practices each year. It also ignores the possibility that failings in the patient’s existing dentistry might complicate treatment at an overseas practice, in which case it may be the UK dentist who ends up facing awkward questions. Terefore, dentists who are offering advice to prospective dental tourists should ensure that their own treatment to date will withstand scrutiny by a foreign colleague.
In conclusion… Dental tourism is an inescapable facet of modern dentistry and it is an option increasingly explored by patients hoping to save money on the more complex components of their dentistry. In dealing with these patients UK dentists should explain the potential for additional costs and clinical complications which may result from having treatment abroad. However, regardless of the advice provided, they are not obligated to rectify any adverse outcomes.
nDoug Hamilton is a GDP and dental adviser at MDDUS
19
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24