This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CABLE INSTALLATION FEATURE JOINING UP


BACKGROUND HISTORY High voltage submarine cable interconnectors between adjacent countries have been around for over 50years. Traditionally, they have been relatively short and HVAC (HighVoltage Alternating Current) cables.


Due to high heat losses, they have been limited to cable lengths of typically 70km- 100km - depending on the amount of energy being carried. But in recent years, with improving technologies, there has been a shift to HVDC (High Voltage Direct Current) systems.


These transmit energy for far greater distances. For example, the BritNed interconnector recently commissioned between the UK and the Netherlands – is over 240km. Many more are underway.


GROWTH MARKET This growth in the interconnector market has many drivers...


• Achieving security of supply • Overcoming onerous onshore environmental constraints


• Advances in DC converter technology • EU directives


The latter requires 15 percent of energy to be from renewable sources by 2020. This means 30-35% of all electricity generated will be from renewable energy.


One consequence is that the countries of Western Europe will need to share renewable energy much more effectively through marine interconnectors; a major challenge given the timescales.


THE DOTS THE FUTURE OF THE GRID


A GREATER CHALLENGE However, a second consequence is even more challenging: how do we integrate the many offshore windfarms being built into a pan-European system?


THE ‘SUPERGRID’ An offshore grid, as envisioned by Eddie O’Connor of Mainstream, which would link farms and interconnectors, could be the answer.


HVDC technology accepts multiple connection nodes and could form the platform on which this Supergrid could be built. However, let’s not think that the infrastructure companies and investors have fully grasped this vision and will look to the construction of an offshore grid from the beginning.


This is not going to be the case. None of the projects mentioned here currently have ‘nodes’ planned to create an offshore network; they are point-to-point. But this is not surprising, as the investment needed and the commercial and supply chain challenges (restricted availability of materials and components, vessels and skilled staff are common to all offshore infrastructure projects) on such a large scale from the outset are prohibitive.


FUTURE SCENARIO – NODAL GRID? So what will happen in the future? Clearly, there is a firm commitment to interconnector development, and, interestingly, toes are being dipped into the water with respect to a nodal grid.


For example, the Dutch company, Tennet, is providing export cables for the German offshore wind market, which include the connection of projects under different ownership to a single export cable system.


Also, recent research, commissioned by the EU, suggests that a nodal, or hub, approach to interconnector and windfarm development may result in savings in the order of €20billion. Therefore, it is probably only a matter of time (if not already) before offshore generation and transmission developers in Western Europe engage in substantive discussions to develop the first node connections to interconnectors.


In the end, joining up the dots will give us the bigger picture.


James Hunt Intertek METOC www.metoc.co.uk


74


www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140