This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
MOONCRAFT MC/RT - 16


Shooting for the stars


Daytona Prototype meets Japanese GT300, as aerodynamic design and bodywork specialist, Mooncraft, develops a whole new concept


W


hen Japanese racecar


manufacturer, Mooncraft, decided to


enter the Super GT series, it was never going to be a simple case of adapting an existing production car into a high performance competition vehicle. The company, founded in 1976, has a long history of developing bespoke racecars, with its first competition cars appearing in the early 1980s.


In 2005, Mooncraft was


approached by Kazuho Takahashi, an enthusiastic gentleman driver, about producing a car for Super GT’s GT300 category, where he already campaigned a Vemac Sportscar. ‘He wanted to drive something that had the look of a Le Mans car, like a Bentley or Toyota GT-ONE,’ explains Takuya Yura, the president of Mooncraft. Yura’s firm is well known in Japan for its aerodynamic design and bodywork development capability, which currently are used by a wide range of constructors, including B-Max and Tokyo R&D for their F4 projects. But the company


is not so well known for chassis development and construction, so for this project Yura’s


engineering team decided to look outside Japan for a suitable basis for the new car. ‘With the chassis, we needed


to find something that had real reliability, and at the right cost. By 2006, many Daytona Prototypes had been built and they were all shown to be very


BY SAM COLLINS


strong. Also the cost of their bare rolling chassis were not that high,’ reveals Yura. ‘The reliability of this car is very good –this is the sixth year it has run, which is way beyond their estimation of its life.’ But a Daytona Prototype


could hardly be considered a GT car, even with the very loose Super GT regulations. It is, after all, a purpose-built racecar, and at that time even GT500 cars had to utilise the core chassis of a production car (though today they use purpose-built composite tubs, see RE V21N12). But Mooncraft had thought of a way around this


problem – it would create a very limited run of ‘production cars’, just as Takahashi’s Vemac, which had been allowed to compete in GT300 for some time. ‘At the time, Super GT


technical regulations said that the car must be based on a


commercially available series production car,’ explains Yura. ‘So we had planned to get a Daytona Prototype chassis, make our own bodywork and then register it for the road, so we could take part in the series. A bit like what Toyota and Nissan did with GT1 in the


The Mooncraft team was spoiled for choice when it came to selecting the running gear, but the Riley Mk XXII proved to be the most suitable for the driver combination


16 www.racecar-engineering.com • February 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100