Flat-Living.co.uk RTM
for a period exceeding 21 years. The building will qualify if at least two thirds of the flats are let to qualifying tenants and the premises consists of a structurally detached building or part of a building that can be served independently. A building will not qualify if more than 25 per cent of the floor area is non- residential, if there are multiple landlords or it is a block of four or less flats with one flat used by the landlord for principle residence. Properties owned by the local authority are excluded. The Right to Manage must be exercised
by an RTM company incorporated with prescribed articles. All leaseholders are entitled to become members with individual liability limited to £1. Since November 2009 RTM companies only require a single director but typically comprise a board of three or more members. Although legislation requires 50 per cent of leaseholders to become company members before an RTM claim notice can be issued it is generally advisable to aim for at least two thirds to join the company, which avoids any criticism that the procedure is undemocratic.
PRESCRIBED ROUTE
The formal procedure for exercising RTM is started by an RTM company serving a claim notice on the landlord. Thereafter it follows a prescribed route comprising further notices and counter notices. RTM is usually determined within two months with the right to take over management following three months later. The benefits to leaseholders are obvious and flat owners all over
the country are now turning to RTM as the best solution to achieving higher standards of property management and increased value for the service charges they pay. Through RTM they have a voice in all key decisions and know exactly how they’re money is spent. A managing agent that is a member of the Association of Residential Managing Agents (ARMA) will provide the additional comfort of a government approved code of practice. More importantly leaseholders can terminate the management contract if the chosen company fails to meet expectations, which is a huge incentive to continually strive harder to provide the competitive services leaseholders demand.
Forming a management company and taking on responsibility
for a block of flats is not a matter to be undertaken lightly especially considering the increasing amount of regulation and statutory requirements for health and safety, although appointing a managing agent reduces the potential risks. The RTM process is not complicated but it is complex and there are pitfalls awaiting those proceeding without professional advice. Innocent mistakes can result in a landlord challenging the claim, forcing leaseholders to apply to the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal, which can prove costly if mishandled. Professional RTM costs vary from about £100 to £300 per flat
according to the size of the block. In addition the landlord is entitled to costs incurred in transferring management, such as legal and audit costs, but these must be reasonable. All these risks are controllable and generally are far outweighed by the advantages of controlling management and service charges.
THE ROLE OF SOLICITORS IN RTM
The law relating to RTM is complex and there are many pitfalls, writes Graham Jaffe of Jaffe Porter Crossick LLP. Instructing a solicitor ensures that the interests of the qualifying tenants are protected and that they are on an equal footing with the landlord who will invariably instruct a solicitor to act upon receipt of an initial notice.
An experienced solicitor will:
Company”) that will exercise the claim including the
14
on the acquisition date.
The Company will inherit the existing management arrangements which may be inadequate or defective. A solicitor can analyse the legal consequences and advise the Company on the best way to modify the situation, by for example, making provision for a reserve fund. A solicitor experienced in dealing with RTM will always be more accountable than a non-professional RTM advisory company. RTM provides a relatively inexpensive way for qualifying tenants to acquire the management of their building without incurring the cost of acquiring the freehold. There is limited scope for the landlord to object or delay the process particularly where an experienced solicitor is instructed.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52