This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Church Council considers mission funding T


he ELCA Church Council took action on proposals to examine and explore new opportunities


to fund the mission of the church when it met April 9-12 in Chicago. Presiding Bishop Elizabeth A.


Eaton appointed in late 2013 a “Mission Support Think Tank” to address the denomination’s finan- cial resources, particularly the decline in mission support (income from congregations shared with the ELCA’s 65 synods and churchwide organization). In a presentation of its report to


the council, Stephen S. Talmage, bishop of the Grand Canyon Synod and a member of the think tank, said, “There is a need for radically reimag- ining mission funding in the church. [While] there is always resistance for change, we need to give ourselves permission for doing something different.” In response to the think tank’s rec-


ommendations, the council: • Affirmed Eaton’s intent of conven- ing a team to generate recommen- dations to “sharpen our priori- ties as a church” and bring clarity about “what this church will do and will not do in order to serve


God’s mission more faithfully and effectively”; and affirmed the need to explore new methods of mis- sion support for the benefit of the whole church.


• Acknowledged that “uniform per- centage guidelines” for mission support are no longer appropri- ate for all synods (typically a 55 percent/45 percent split of money from congregations between the churchwide office and synods, respectively). In consultation with the ELCA Conference of Bish- ops and Office of the Presiding Bishop, the council approved the development of a process that will result in synod-specific percent- age goals no later than its April 2018 meeting.


• Endorsed the principle that mul- tiple streams of income may be used to provide mission funding and instructed churchwide units and offices to draft a revised con- stitutional provision to reflect the use of multiple sources of income. In a separate action, the council


approved a revised 2015 fiscal-year current fund spending authoriza- tion of $69.3 million and a revised 2015 fiscal-year ELCA World Hun-


NOTICE: MOVING SERVICES


Skip Higgins 225-937-0700 (Cell)


“Moving Lutheran clergy to new ministries since 1982.” • Clergy discounts


www.custommovers.netskip@custommovers.net •Only one survey/ 3 estimates


• Full value protection plans • Internet satellite tracking


CUSTOM MOVERS - FHWA Lic. # MC370752 * Certain Restrictions Apply.


12 www.thelutheran.org • Major van lines represented • $200/Day late pick-up/late delivery penalty* • 24/7 cell phone contact to assure your peace of mind ELCA News Service


ger spending authorization of $20.6 million. In other business, the council


voted to move forward on unifying the ELCA’s three lay rosters—associ- ates in ministry, deaconesses and dia- conal ministers—but delay consider- ation of the entrance rite and related issues, a recommendation offered by the Conference of Bishops. Currently associates in ministry are commis- sioned; deaconesses and diaconal ministers are consecrated. A decision will need to be made


about the appropriate entrance rite for the unified roster. The council will consider a proposal on the for- mation of a single ELCA lay roster during its November 2015 meeting, and it will consider a proposal on the appropriate entrance rite and related issues during its fall 2018 meeting. The council received reports from


other ELCA officers and, among other actions: • Received an update on Always Being Made New: The Campaign for the ELCA, which completed its first year with nearly $45 million raised. The amount represents 23 percent of the five-year, $198 mil- lion Jan. 31, 2019, goal.


• Extended the time for the devel- opment of an ELCA social mes- sage on gender-based violence until its November 2015 meeting.


• Declined to ask ELCA congrega- tions to end confirmation as a “ritualized right of youth.”


• Affirmed the resolve by the 2013 ELCA Churchwide Assembly that the denomination be encouraged to speak out as advocates for vot- ing rights. 


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52