This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
tool, with more than half of respondents reporting getting alert in their EMR/clinical system. As for more comprehensive data, just 22 percent said that three-quarters of the data captured by mobile devices was integrated into their EMRs. Providers were fans of the enhanced


access to patient data—especially the ability to view it remotely. But most were still vexed by cost issues, with majorities pointing to funding limitations as the top hurdle to wider mobile adoption at their organizations. Perhaps that’s why more and more


organizations are starting to closely track the money spent on these tools: roughly half of respondents formally measure return on investment related to mobile technology, and one-third of respondents evaluate the total cost of ownership as it relates to their mobile strategy, according to HIMSS. “Not too many people are measuring ROI yet, as well as total cost of ownership,” says Collins. “That’s a gap—one that kind of aligns itself with the gap of the number of people who don’t have a mobile technology policy in place.”


Discovering All the Advantages Which is no particular surprise,


after all. “It reflects on the fact that mobile


is still relatively young. And people are still grappling with it,” he says. The challenges are many and varied, and most facilities are still experimenting with what works best for them: BYOD, whether they’re going to build apps in-house or outsource them, how to deploy within and outside. All in all, it points to one big


fact: well-thought-out policies are crucial. “It’s pretty important to have something like that in place before you try to integrate mobile into the overall system,” says Collins. Were there any surprises when


compiling this most recent survey, or when parsing the results? One was that apps are starting to get


a little more traction, within provider organizations, and most respondents say they have plans to launch new apps, he says. Another had to do with the types


of technology, and the fact that there’s “more of a rise in the use of tablets—


IMAGE © FOTOLIA / FRESH IDEA CONNECTION/HEALTHCARE IT 2014.Q3 3


specifically medical tablets, he says. “I think people are starting to see the portability and flexibility of that technology.” In-hospital, clinicians said they


were most likely to use mobile tools for accessing patient information, 69 percent, such as labs or imaging, or clinical decision support at 65 percent, according to the HIMSS survey. But it’s outside the hospital walls, post-discharge, that the tablets and apps seem, lately, to be really starting to find favor. More than one-third of respondents


said they provider at least one app for patient or consumer use.


Big Advances Drive Success One recent phenomenon is


especially interesting. “Mobile discharge kits seem to be


really starting to take off,” says Collins. “You discharge the patient with the tablet, with the pulse oximeter, with the scale. They have information at their fingertips regarding what meds they’re on. They can engage with their provider remotely. That seems to be providing a lot of value—satisfaction- wise and financially—both to providers and patients.” “Programs like those have seen


success at Geisinger Health System, CHRISTUS Health, Hackensack Alliance ACO and beyond, he says, clearly showing there’s a trend in the value and use of the technology.” The payers are noticing too. As


pointed out in a 2013 Chilmark Research study, big changes in technology and payment strategies means insurance companies are making the most of mobile technology—both to enable outreach to high-cost populations and market themselves to potential new post-Affordable Care Act customers. On the provider side, health systems


and ACOs are “saying, ‘It’s literally cheaper for me to buy this technology and give it to patients than it is for us to eat the cost, manage their chronic care and have them readmitted with these high costs in an inpatient setting,’” says Collins. And while mobile tools have long


enabled telemedicine for patients in rural areas hours away from the nearest hospital, “now you’re starting to see more localized use, with the new


technology,” in the interest in keeping high-risk patients healthy. “They’re trying to get a handle


on chronic disease management,” says HIMSS Analytics Executive Vice President John Hoyt. And so you see a redoubled focus on weight gain, diabetes: Bluetooth-enabled scales that send data back to providers, even new insulin pumps with their own IP addresses. “They’re sending data to the cloud,”


says Hoyt. “Not the EMR—because it’s too much data, it’s like every 10 seconds—but I was at a Stage 7 visit at OSU, at the endocrine clinic, and they were looking at data.” They noticed, for instance that a


young person’s blood sugar went up before dinner: “‘You’re getting dinner a little too late, can you move it up?’” says Hoyt. “They’re looking at the data on her pump from the cloud, and then can download a summary of the data to Epic.” If clinicians are still grappling


with how best to deploy mobile tools in-hospital, this sort of use for remote care management looks to be making big advances. “We will continue to increase


(mobile usage) inside the hospital walls, just for efficiency’s sake,” says Hoyt. “But the real impactful use is outside, between visits.” “Remote patient monitoring


is huge, and we’re going to see an explosion there,” says Collins. “It’s going to impact the baby boomer population all over the world.”


ABOUT THE AUTHOR Mike Miliard is Managing Editor at Healthcare IT News. Mike covers topics such as health information exchange, privacy and security, analytics and ICD-10.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36