INSIDER | COLUMN Mechanical Engineering: Better by Design


DUC PHAM, SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM


W


hen meeting prospective students and their parents, I am often asked these two questions: what distinguishes mechanical engineering from other engineering disciplines and what differentiates between our


educational offerings and those of our peers. To the first question, I have sometimes, with tongue in cheek, given the following reply:


If it smells, it's chemical engineering; If it is invisible, it's electrical engineering; If it is static, it's civil engineering; If it MOVES, it's mechanical engineering!


It is not difficult to imagine the annoyance that my stereotypical response


can cause non-mechanical engineers. However, few would dispute my answers to the second question about the differences between our degree programmes and those offered by other institutions. One of our main distinguishing features — indeed what we consider to be


the soul of our Mechanical Engineering programmes — is our strong focus on mechanical engineering science. Mechanical engineering used to be taught as a craft and it was my predecessors’ predecessors that introduced the teaching of the subject as a science. Apparently, we were the first in the country to do so and teaching mechanical engineering science fundamentals has been a specialty of our School for at least the past 70 years. Readers of this column may recall another USP of our degree programmes —- our enquiry-based learning approach typified by the car breakdown exercise we set our Year 2 students as part of their mechanical engineering design class (see “Do Cars have a SOUL?” CMM Vol 6 No 4). Where else would students be given a chance to take a luxurious sports car apart (psst! I can quietly reveal it’s an Aston Martin) and dissect every component in it to discover the underlying design philosophy? This brings me to a more serious answer to the question about what


differentiates a mechanical engineer from other engineers. I would strongly argue that it is the creative, innovative and flexible mindset mechanical engineers acquire as a result of their training, particularly in how to solve design problems. Given that training in design is so central to the formation of high-calibre


mechanical engineers, since taking the helm of our School, I have encouraged colleagues to increase the emphasis on design in our degree programmes. To foster creativity and innovation in design, we have introduced new material on creative and innovative problem solving. Earlier this year, when the Institution of Mechanical Engineers came to accredit our degree programmes, they heard and approved our plans to incorporate design elements in almost every module. This design emphasis adds to our USP. Design integrates knowledge from the


other mechanical engineering subjects. It enables students to apply what they have learnt in those subjects, thereby gaining a deeper understanding of them. This enhances their learning experience and helps them to become better engineers. It is part of our strategy for producing flexibly minded mechanical engineering graduates armed with both analytical powers founded on a solid grounding in engineering science and creative, innovative and entrepreneurial skills developed by an enquiry-based education. I write this article in the week when our University announced the


appointment of Lord Karan Bilimoria of Chelsea as our next Chancellor. Here is a creative and innovative person who, in a very short time span, built a business empire starting, not with £5 in his pocket like some other entrepreneurs did, but with £20,000 in student debt. With the education they receive from us, I am sure that our graduates are well equipped to follow in his footsteps should they choose to do so.


http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/schools/mechanical-engineering/index.aspx


[ S e n s o f a r ]


New: Confocal Interferometric AND


Focus Variation


Sensofar S neox for research and industry


 Confocal, Interferometer and Focus Variation modes in the same instrument


 Superposed high resolution color and height images


 Roughness according ISO 25178  Vertical resolution down to 0.01 nm  Long working distance objectives


We also supply


AFMs for research, industry and teaching Nano-/Micro- Indenter and Tribology Tester, Nanoparticle size measurement, LEED/AES, Stylus Profiler


Contact your nearest office Germany


France South +


info@schaefer-tec.com +49 6103 300 980


info@schaefer-tech.com +33 1 6449 6350


see@schaefer-tec.com


East Europe +39 0425 272 28 Switzerland ch@schaefer-tec.com +41 34 423 7070


www.schaefer-tec.com 35 | commercial micro manufacturing international Vol 7 No.3


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52