This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BRAND STRATEGY


“Brands need to recognise the value of their social media assets and protect them accordingly,” says Smith.


“Tere is no excuse for not taking sensible precautions such as using the most secure passwords and taking care over who has access to them, as well as using management tools to ensure that employee access to accounts can be easily revoked,” he says.


Sponsorship scandals


Sportswear brand Nike is well known for its high profile advertising campaigns featuring some of the world’s most celebrated athletes.


However, in February this year the company had to suspend its contract with Paralympic sprinter Oscar Pistorius aſter he admitted shooting dead his girlfriend at their home in South Africa. At the time he was arrested, Pistorius featured in an ad on Nike’s website under the slogan ‘I am the bullet in the chamber’.


Nike pulled the ads immediately and suspended the contract one week later. But as Internet users pointed out in a series of online memes, it’s not the first time an athlete affiliated with


the company has been involved in scandal: in October 2012, Nike terminated its contract with cyclist Lance Armstrong aſter he was stripped of his Tour de France titles for his involvement in illegal doping and in 2009, it was leſt red-faced when client Tiger Woods was revealed to be a serial adulterer.


While it’s impossible to prevent a client behaving badly,


James Hennigan, a partner at Squire


Sanders who specialises in sports, branding and IP law, says there are measures brands can take to limit the damage done if a sponsorship campaign turns sour.


“Sponsorship deals can be high risk but with high rewards. Te best thing a brand can do to protect itself is insert a morality or good behaviour clause into its contract with a sports star or celebrity. Tese clauses allow the brand to terminate a contract, and possibly recover payments made to a celebrity if that person misbehaves,” he says.


As Hennigan points out, though, there is a fine balance to be struck between protecting your assets and deterring potential clients.


“Tere should be measures in place to allow for a quick and clean escape in the case of a high profile


scandal, but brands have to weigh up whether it is worth terminating a contract from both a legal and a public relations perspective, and it should be reserved for serious cases. If a brand is seen to terminate a contract the moment an athlete steps a little out of line, others maybe discouraged from agreeing to endorse that brand,” he adds.


Sonia Patel, a senior associate at Field Fisher Waterhouse, says brands should also maintain a close relationship with an athlete’s representatives, particularly those responsible for their public relations and social media activity.


“Parties can then work together in making appropriate statements and sending out the right messages in all relevant media. Te more proactive a brand is in handling a crisis, the more likely it is to recover from it,” she says.


“However, when making such statements in social media, the brand should bear in mind that the tone of any such messages is tailored to the target audience. For example, a corporate message which might be included in a press release may not be suitable for a Twitter or Facebook audience and humour should be used very carefully,” she adds. 


2013 SEMINAR SERIES


PRACTICE SEMINAR APRIL 8-12, 2013


This one week seminar is designed to provide a comprehensive overview of U.S. trademark practice. Beginning with introductory lectures on the U.S. trademark system, subject matter becomes more complex throughout the week. Our knowledgeable lecturers draw from years of experience in the trademark field and focus on real life case examples.


Seminars held at BSKB’s Offices in:


Metropolitan Washington, DC


8110 Gatehouse Road, Suite 100E Falls Church, VA 22042


© 2013 Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP. All rights reserved.


t: 703.205.8000 | f: 703.205.8050 bskb.com | seminars@bskb.com


U.S. TRADEMARK


SUMMER PATENT SEMINAR


JUNE 5-28, 2013


A three and a half week seminar covering all major areas of U.S. patent law, beginning with an overview of the U.S. patent system and moving on to more complex subjects such as patent prosecution, infringement litigation, and post-grant procedures. Includes practical problems and discussion of recent cases where applicable, with a focus on how practice must change in view of the America Invents Act (AIA).


ADVANCED PATENT &


LICENSING SEMINAR SEP. 23 - OCT. 4, 2013


This two week seminar focuses on advanced topics in U.S. patent law and includes workshops and problem solving in order to illustrate the more advanced concepts with regard to prosecution, claim interpretation, and validity and infringement issues. Participants learn how to modify and determine the scope of a granted U.S. patent, as well as how to address significant licensing issues.


www.worldipreview.com


Trademarks Brands and the Internet Volume 2, Issue 2


23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44