Standing Waves
IS YOUR FAVORITE PADDLING
ROUTE PROTECTED? PHOTO: KAYDI PYETTE
IF YOU PADDLE IN CANADA, YOU SHOULD BE CONCERNED
PROTECTING LAKES AND RIVERS: FAIL
When as many as 30,000 Canadian lakes and rivers were removed from protected status late in 2012, paddlers on both sides of the border were up in arms. The 130-year-old Navigable Waters Protection Act was re-
branded in November last year in favor of the more industry- friendly Navigable Protection Act, which now protects a mere 97 lakes, 62 rivers and three oceans throughout Canada’s almost four million square miles. Did your favorite paddling destination make the cut? Given the
numbers, it’s unlikely. Popular canoe tripping areas that have been removed from the protection of the Act include Lady Evelyn Lake in Ontario’s famed Temagami area, New Brunswick’s salmon-rich and canoe-poling friendly Miramichi River, the Northwest Ter- ritories’ famed Slave River, and Quebec’s classic tripping river, the Dumoine. The province of Newfoundland and Labrador and northern territories Nunavut and the Yukon have just one pro- tected river a piece, so don’t expect to find your favorite paddling routes protected there. “Waterways are less protected today than they were a year ago,”
says John Bennett, executive director of the Sierra Club Canada. “If you paddle in Canada you should be concerned—your favorite destination, if there happens to be natural resources upstream, can now be exploited with much less scrutiny than before.” The original Navigable Waters Protection Act prevented con-
struction that could interfere with the navigation of any body of water in Canada—navigable was considered anything you could paddle in a canoe so pretty much every waterway received pro-
tection. The purpose of the act was to prevent dams and bridges from springing up without the government’s knowledge but it also became very strong environmental protection. In late February, documents made public by the Access to In-
formation Act suggested that these changes might have occurred at the suggestion of big business. The Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA) met with senior officials in the fall of 2011, urging them to streamline environmental assessments and also make “new regulations under (the) Navigable Waters Protection Act,” according to a CEPA slide presentation. The Canadian government maintains that changes to the Act
were made to reduce red tape for municipalities and cottagers seeking federal approval for small projects, and waterways lack- ing status will be protected by other laws as well as provinces and municipalities. Bennett takes issue with that. “The Navigable Waters Protec-
tion Act was the trigger that brought the federal government into proposals that would effect a lake or river. They’ve effectively tak- en themselves out of environmental protection and given it to other jurisdictions.” According to Bennett, “federal government has the ability to
properly assess, monitor and enforce environmental laws. You can’t evenly enforce municipal and provincial laws across the country. “The smaller the jurisdiction, the more susceptible it is to indus-
try pressure,” he adds. —Kaydi Pyette See if your favorite lake or river made the cut at www.rapidmedia.
com/0003.
www.rapidmedia.com 19
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74