This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Innovative Meetings By Michelle Russell


The ‘PeopleWhoMake Computers Less Computer-y’ Conference


As meeting professionals grapple with how to use technology to enhance face-to-face engagement at their events, a conference for people who make computer-human interaction their life’s work offers a few possibilities.


A flexible smartphone made of electronic paper was just one of the futuristic tech tools unveiled at theCHI 2011Conference, held at the Vancouver Convention Centre on May 7–12. That comes as no surprise. CHI is shorthand for the Special InterestGroup onComputer-Human Interaction (SIGCHI) of theAssociation forCom- putingMachinery (ACM). The full name of the conference is evenmore of amouthful: theACM CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Yet the focus is less on computing systems


than youmight expect. For participants atCHI— which has been held for 30 years, andwhich this year attractedmore than 2,700 people—it’s all about human interaction: with technology, and with each other. “What I tellpeople about this client,”saidJaneé


Pelletier, CMP, vice president of Conference & LogisticsConsultants, “is that these are the people who make computers less ‘computer-y.’” The group is unlike many engineering or computing societies, where “there’s a lot of technology for technology’s sake,”saidPelletier,whomanages the logistics forCHI’s conferences. “That is notwhat this group is like at all.” Thatmay be a result of the cross-disciplinary


natureof SIGCHI’smembers andattendees.These are“engineers andscientists andthe ‘big thinkers,’” Pelletier said,“but they alsohave sociologists,psy- chologists, andpeoplewhoare interestedindesign and ergonomics. There’s a lot of design around, ‘Okay,we’vemade amouse,buthowcanwemake themouse fit your hand?’ This is the group that wasdemo-ing virtual reality inthe ’80s,before any- one ever heard of aWii orXbox; this is the group that came up with touch-screen computers. The people in this Special InterestGroup understand that technology is a tool; it’s not an end in itself.


38 pcma convene September 2011


They areworking tomake computers that enhance and improve everyday life.” More than 100 people work at the confer-


ence, “and only two of us are paid to do it,” she said. “The volunteers are very invested, and some of them work so many hours that I forget that they’re volunteers.”Moreover, SIGCHI truly talks about itself“as a community,”Pelletier said,“and more thananyof theother clients that Iworkwith, they’re friends.They’ve seeneachotherat these con- ferences for 30 years. It’s a very collegial group.” HowCHImelds high-techwith high-touch is


instructive formeeting professionals across every industry.


MoreThanDisplays At the37paidbooths intheCHI2011exhibithall, “therewere things thatwill blowyourmind,” Pel- letier said. “They are 10 to 20 years down the road.” In addition, therewas a strong poster pro- gram,withmore than 200 posters, called “works in progress.” But thisbeingtheComputer-HumanInteraction


group, animportant elementof the conferencewas something calledsimply Interactivity—interactive demo stations located in meeting rooms and the ballroom. “These areworks that are being devel- oped in the university setting,” Pelletier said, “which may or may not be commercially viable.”About 21 different performance-based demos took place as part of Interactivity this year, including a number of smartphone apps, such as Graffito, a technology designed for festivals. “There’s a big, white screen, and everybody logs onto the same app,” Pelletier said. “You can use yourphone likeapaintbrushandit showsuponthe screen.Ten,20,or100people canalldoit atonce. It’s interactive,digitalart-making,andit’samazing.” While some of the tools in Interactivity were


ILLUSTRATION BY MICK WIGGINS


At CHI, it’s a commonly accepted practice to get up and leave during one session to go to another if “something more inter- esting is going on in another room.Within their culture, that’s perfectly acceptable. It encourages presenters to make sure that what they’re presenting is engaging.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108