This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Sorting a Savage Part 2 THE CONCLUSION By Laurie Holland


groups mind you but the four batches covering 24.9 to 25.2gn ran at 0.15” to 0.4” (figure 3). Wow! Cracked it (again!). All I needed was a long-range match in reasonable conditions to prove I was back in business.


...and Dashed!


The PSSA competition calendar fixtures allied to long bouts of stormy weather denied me that opportunity until the second Saturday of the new year, which saw a 600 yard F-Class match coincide with cold but settled weather – only 600 yards but enough distance to show if the ‘verticals’ had gone.


New load or not they hadn’t, or at least not in the first half of the event. If anything, things were worse with the corrected elevation graph jumping up and down the paper between shots to produce a 2.5-MOA overall spread and more often than not a ‘minute’ of movement between shots. Then at shot 13 everything appeared to settle down and things were much improved to shot 19 - five of the seven hits displaying really impressive consistency. A glimmer of hope appeared – if my final shot stayed within a quarter minute variation, things were maybe on the up. Sadly not – along with my hopes, the strike went way, way down again, now at the very bottom of the four-ring, a drop of around 0.8-MOA on the PSSA 500/600yd ‘F’ target.


So, what is going on? I wish I knew! I feel I’m just on the edge of getting it back together again. Maybe checking and re-tuning the cartridge overall lengths, looking at neck tension, retrying some of the powders originally rejected, switching from the 90gn VLD to the 80.5gn and 90gn Berger BT designs will get it shooting well again. However, national GBFCA League rounds are approaching fast and getting loads sorted for my newly rebarrelled .308 Win F/TR rifle looks a lot less risky at the minute!


Lots of people did warn me when I started out with long-range .223 Rem that the cartridge is incredibly finicky with 90gn bullets and often just goes ‘out of tune’ for no apparent reason. I think the lesson for me as well as others is just how ‘high-maintenance’ this combination is. If everything isn’t perfect, it simply doesn’t work.


Figure 1: rear screw tension set at 5 – 20 in/lb


Figure 2: rear screw tensions above 20 in/lb made groups considerably larger


18


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102