BEER AND NOW
Macro in Craft Clothing With tricky marketing, larger breweries attempt to disguise beer origin By Jeff Hammett
Jeff Hammett first noticed craft beer early in college when a friend introduced him to Stone Brewing Co.’s Pale Ale. After gradu- ating from UCSD with a degree in Philoso- phy, he moved to Santa Cruz where he frequented Santa Cruz Mountain Brewing and Seabright Brewery. Jeff would journey up to San Francisco to visit Magnolia and Toronado every chance he got. He started blogging about beer in early 2009 while living in Durango, Colorado. For a town of only 20,000 people, Durango boasts an impressive four breweries. Jeff quickly became a part of the brewing scene, and in January 2010 was invited to work with Ska Brewing Co.’s Head Brewer Thomas Larsen to formulate a recipe and brew on Ska’s pilot system. In addition to his love of craft beer, Mr. Hammett is an avid cyclist and can be seen riding on the road or trails most weekends.
few months back, I got an e-mail from the public relations company representing MillerCoors about a “pre-Prohibition style lager,” Batch 19, before its launch on draft in the San Diego area. I was offered a sample of the beer along with some promotional materi- als, and although I’ve never been one to drink the macro lagers (because my intro to drinking was in college with the likes of Stone Pale Ale and Karl Strauss Red Trolley Ale), who am I to turn down a free drink? Weeks later a package arrived with two bottles of Batch 19 and some marketing gimmicks, including an old timey quill style pen and a deck of branded playing cards. The beer, which I didn’t have high hopes for, was actually pretty good, but what struck me the most was its market- ing. The bottles appear to be custom-made with embossed features and fancy labels that don’t prominently mention Coors. In San Diego, however, Batch 19 is only available on draft, and the tap handles at bars don’t mention Coors at all. If some- one wants to find out who makes Batch 19, it’s not too difficult to discover who’s behind it, but they’re certainly not adver- tising the fact.
A
Blue Moon, brewed by Coors Brewing Company, has been the long time “sheep in wolves clothing” in the beer industry. It’s a wit beer and different enough from Coors’ usual bland lagers, and combined with its “Blue Moon Brewing Company” branding, can be misleading for consum- ers. They even go so far as to use the phrase “Artfully Crafted” in some of their promotional material to further push the issue.
Coors Brewing Company isn’t the only big brewer to capitalize on the increasing demand for craft beer. Anheuser-Busch InBev also produces Shock Top, and last year purchased Goose Island, a Chicago brewery founded in 1988, for close to
40 million dollars. Reactions in the beer industry to the sale were mixed, but many craft beer drinkers I’ve spoken to say they will no lon- ger buy the former craft brewery’s beers. According to the Brewers As- sociation, Goose Island is no longer a craft brewer because it’s owned by an “alcoholic beverage industry member who is not themselves a craft brewer.”
One of Goose Island’s most popular beers is 312 Urban Wheat Ale, named after Chicago’s area code. Shortly after its acquisition, AB InBev applied for federal trade- marks of other popular area codes-- including 619. It’s not yet known what AB InBev plans to use these trademarks for, but some speculate that they may release and market beers specific to each of the cities to appear as if they were brewed local- ly. The thought of a beer with 619 in its name, brewed nowhere near San Diego by a multinational cor- poration, isn’t a pleasant thought. It’s that idea of origin that I find so important when it comes to mac- ro produced beers masquerading as craft beers. Most of the big brewers aren’t branding their pseudo craft beers in a way that easily identifies them to consumers. Stone Brew- ing Company Co-founder and CEO Greg Koch explained this idea of origin and deceit to the Chicago beer blog Chitown on Tap, and while he was discussing only the Goose Island purchase, I think his words ring true with regards to area code beers as well:
“What I don’t like is when the public is misled or not given accurate information
so that they can make their own educated choice. So if you think a beer is be- ing produced in one area and it’s really being pro- duced somewhere else, or you think a beer is being produced by a given com- pany but it’s really being produced by another one. I call foul. That to me is the delineator. It’s not so much whether you want to call it craft. For me, I’m asking: Is the message accurate? Does it mesh with reality? As a consumer, I don’t like to be misled. I want the truth to be easy to understand and not require special knowledge. Is that too much to ask?” - Greg Koch
Paso Robles’ Firestone Walker Brewing Company recently re- branded one of their beers, a blonde ale usually named by each Central Coast bar it’s served in, as 805 Blonde Ale. A nod to its brewing origins, the release of 805 Blonde Ale, complete with locally-sourced tap handles at 75-100 locations in the first quarter, may or may not be in response to AB InBev’s possible plans for other area code beers. It’s not bad timing.
Aside from West Coaster, Jeff
also writes for San Diego Beer Blog at
sandiegobeerblog.com, and you can follow him on twitter @SDBeer
16-
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21