Trans RINA, Vol 153, Part A4, Intl J Maritime Eng, Oct-Dec 2011
constrained to 32.2m. Additionally to the above the expanded canal will permit a greater proportion of world trade to pass through the shortened route, reducing the total volume of sea trade in terms of tonne-miles, further reducing CO2 production. This subject is recommended for further study to fully identify the carbon reduction windfall that may be generated by the Canal’s expansion.
8. 1.
2. 3. REFERENCES
BUXTON, I.L., ‘Trends in ship sizes – will hulls always grow larger?’, The Naval Architect, April 2004, pp 22-26.
PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY (ACP), ‘Proposal for
the Expansion of the Panama
Canal: third set of locks project’, Panama Canal Authority, April 24, 2006.
PAYER, H. G. AND R. BROSTELLA, ‘The panama
canal 4.
5. 6.
7.
8. 9.
expansion and the panamax
vessels of the future’, Transactions - Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 114, 2007: pp 187-208.
‘In-depth: Containerships: The rise of the 'neo- Panamax'’ The Naval Architect June 2009, pp 18-20.
THOMSON, B., ‘Panamax gets larger’, Motor Ship 88(1045): 4, 2008.
‘First optimised Panamax vessels unveiled - GL concept vessel under way’, Ships and Shipping 7(5): 22, 2007. ‘The
Panama Canal: A plan to
prosperity’, The Economist, December 3, 2009,
www.economist.com .
PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY (ACP), ‘Transit Statistics’,
www.pancanal.com, 2011.
PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY (ACP), ‘OP NOTICE TO SHIPPING No. N-1-2010 (Revision 1): Vessel Requirements’, Panama Canal Authority, April 16, 2010.
10. CLARKSON RESEARCH SERVICES LIMITED, ‘Clarkson Shipping Intelligence Weekly’, 26 July 2010
11. 12.
PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY (ACP), ‘2010 Annual Report’
www.pancanal.com, 2011.
‘The post-expansion puzzle’, Fairplay Magazine, 1 July 2010, pp 43.
13. CLARKSON RESEARCH SERVICES LIMITED, ‘World Shipyard Monitor’, various editions.
14.
15. 16.
STOPFORD, M., ‘Maritime Economics’, 3rd Edition, London, Routledge, 2009.
ENGELEN, S., W. DULLAERTZX, ET AL, "Market efficiency within dry bulk markets in the short run: A multi-agent system dynamics nash equilibrium." Maritime Policy and Management 36(5)2009: pp 385-396.
‘Guide to port entry 2011/12’, Reigate, Surrey: Shipping Guides Limited, 2010.
unlock 23. 24. 22. 17. 18. 20.
TSUNEISHI CORPORATION, ‘Kamsarmax 82/BC’,
http://www.tsuneishi.co.jp/tess/factbook.
‘Worldwide Shipyards 2011’, 4th Edition,
www.ship2yard.com, 2011.
19. WATSON, D. G. M., 'Practical ship design', Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1998, 531 pp.
FISHER, K.W., 'The Relative Costs of Ship Design Parameters', Trans 1974, pp. 129-155.
RINA, Vol. 116, 21. MOLLAND,
HUDSON D.A., ‘Design metrics for evaluating the propulsive efficiency Proceedings
of HOLTROP, J. AND MENNEN, G. G. J.,
A.F., TURNOCK, S.R. AND of
'A
statistical power prediction method', International Shipbuilding Progress, vol. 25, no.290, 1978, pp. 253-256.
SCHNEEKLUTH, H. AND BERTRAM, V., 'Ship design for efficiency and economy'. 2nd ed. Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998, 220 pp
BUHAUG , O., CORBETT, J.J., ENDRESEN, O., EYRING, V., FABER, J., HANAYAMA, S., LEE, D.S., LEE, D., LINDSTAD, H., MARKOWSKA,
A.Z., MJELDE, A.,
NELISSEN, D., PALSSON, C., WINEBRAKE, J.J., WU, W., YOSHIDA, K., ‘Second IMO GHG Study’,
International Maritime Organisation (IMO), London, April 2009 future ships’, International Marine Design
Conference, IMDC 2009, Trondheim, May 26 – 29 2009, pp 209 – 225.
©2011: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects
A-229
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64