This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Tide — continued from Page 28


court can only do so much in terms of establishing benchmarks for the viability, and value, of plaintiffs’ claims in large consolidated cases, no matter how many similarities individual cases may share. Bellwether trials can be helpful and informative, but they offer a minuscule sample size of the extant cases. As such, the goal of the PSC should not simply be to grind through discovery, and shepherd plaintiffs’ general theories past the inevitable Daubert and summary judg- ment motions, or even to try a handful of bellwether cases. Rather, in order to put the largest number of plaintiffs in the best position to achieve good results at the time of settlement, the PSC should


prepare counsel across the country for trial. Regrettably, work product that achieves this objective is still the excep- tion, not the rule. There is, however, an analogue for


this kind of work product in the form of the “trial package,” produced by the Vioxx MDL PSC. This was an effort by the plaintiffs’ leadership to deliver common benefit work product which would actual- ly enable practitioners to try a case after remand. It was designed not simply as a repository for the detritus of more than five years of discovery, but as a tool with the trial of a pharmaceutical case firmly in mind. For just this reason, the trial package was organized along the lines of


a trial notebook. While space prevents an in-depth examination of the entire pack- age, a discussion of the following major sections offers an adequate introduction: Liability Case; Science Case; Case Presentation and Themes; Witnesses; and Cross Examination Modules. In some measure, the PSC was able


to deliver this product because of the way in which the litigation unfolded. When Vioxx was pulled from the market in September 2004, the litigation was already quite mature. A large number of cases had been pending in various state courts for more than two years, most in a consolidated proceeding before Judge Carol Higbee, in Atlantic City, New Jersey. By the time the MDL was ordered, before Judge Eldon Fallon in the Eastern District of Louisiana, a sub- stantial amount of discovery had already been completed. This enabled the feder- al litigation to hit the ground running, with a bellwether trial beginning less than a year after the court’s first hearing. (See In re Vioxx Products Liab. Litig., MDL 1657, 2011 WL 3563004 (E.D. La. Aug. 9, 2011).) • Liability Case The liability section provided an


overview of the Vioxx case, taking the user through most of the main themes, including: the development of the drug, as well as others in the same class; the competitive pressure that motivated Merck, the drug’s manufacturer; the company’s marketing blitz following FDA approval; the publication of key studies demonstrating the risks of Vioxx; and, finally, the withdrawal of the drug from the market. The liability section itself contained the following subsections: • Liability Playbook The playbook provided a narrative


summary of the Vioxx liability case, with citations to exhibits, deposition testimony and relevant medical literature. The play- book functioned as an introduction to the case, comprehensively addressing all major issues, with specific references to evidence, including documents, deposi- tion and medical literature. This enabled attorneys with limited previous exposure


See Tide, Page 32 30 — The Advocate Magazine JANUARY 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96