Trans RINA, Vol 153, Part A1, Intl J Maritime Eng, Jan-Mar 2011
Figure 8: The sequence of JSS configuration options [28]
Figure 9: An example design in the set of destroyer designs on adoption of full electric power [29]
The second study looked, far more speculatively, at future laser and rail gun installations in a future Air Defence Destroyer and Figure 10, from Reference 30, highlights the fit of the “Fight” DBBs into a balanced ship design. Such studies can be seen as a way of informing a major navy of the consequences of new technologies. Thus both the specific technological development can be assessed, for its wider cost impact, and any associated ship
research and development
programmes can be justified, initiated and directed to tackle broader issues. Without such early ship impact considerations the latter are unlikely to be appreciated until potentially too late, leading to the need for expensive design changes in service. These two sets of studies were less part of a specific new programme’s requirement elucidation than showing how ship impact research could be initiated and risk reduced, and so is still seen as consistent with the first “bubble” of Figure 2.
A-34
©2011: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74