major questions that need to be addressed by those considering a captive, namely:
“Feasibility studies are an integral part of the formation process, providing invaluable insights into the scope, challenges and objectives of the captive within the context of the parent’s business plans, but are themselves not without their own specific challenges.”
then “it is critical for someone from human resources to be integrally involved in the captive evaluation”. Externally, a “team of experts that would comprise finance and actuarial capabilities, as well as tax and legal, and also include brokerage and captive management resources to help with the implementation of the captive” would further bolster the mix as the parent approaches its feasibility study.
The second concern that Lochner highlighted in the feasibility process was in gathering “appropriate data” in order to conduct an effective analysis of whether, and how, a captive should be considered by the parent. Included among such details should be “financial projections of what the captive’s results might look like”, in order that results and expectations can be aligned. Lochner also highlighted issues inherent in the data-gathering process that could impact the validity of such information. He indicated that a key issue relates to “client data versus industry data, where the challenge is trying to obtain a sufficient quantity of data from the client, such that the data is statistically credible and can be relied upon”. This can be tricky, particularly if the parent has a deficit of pertinent data or “the history of the firm’s development from an insurance perspective” is deficient. Issues such as recent merger and acquisition activity, changes in service providers and any holes in the company’s data set can all serve to complicate the issue, and it is evident that clarity of information is an essential component of an effective study.
Five questions...
Captive feasibility studies are designed to drill down into the motivations and expectations of the parent company. Why do you want to own a captive, what do you hope it will bring to the business? Asked about what are the key questions that one should ask when considering a feasibility study, Lochner outlined five
20 US Captive . April 2011
1. What are my organisation’s objectives for considering the formation of a captive, and will a captive in fact help my organisation achieve those objectives?
2. How much is the captive going to cost—both in money and time— to start up, and to operate going forward?
3. What are the likely financial results of establishing a captive and what adverse scenarios could result, recognising it is a risk-bearing entity?
4. How much capital and surplus is required to support the captive? 5. Where should the captive be domiciled?
By addressing these five questions, and doing so in an honest, enquiring manner, parent firms should be able to paint an accurate picture of exactly why a captive insurance entity is—or is not—an appropriate solution for them.
...and five more The questions get even more complicated for those considering a
group captive. As Lochner made clear, whilst the same five questions apply to those considering group captives, a further five are worth bearing in mind, if not during the feasibility study itself, then during the implementation phase. These are:
1. Who will qualify to participate in the group? 2. How will the group’s risks be underwritten and by whom?
3. Will the programme be assessable? For example, if losses are significant and additional money is needed, will the group captive go back after additional contributions from each of the insureds?
4. How will claims be handled?
5. And importantly, if a member leaves, will they get any of their money back, and if so, when and how is that determined?
However, as Lochner pointed out, sometimes “these issues are
not considered at the outset of a group captive”, creating obvious concerns moving forward as the position of the group captive, and that of the parent’s captive entity within it, develop. Close attention, it would seem, needs to be paid to both sets of questions.
An educational document Addressing the aforementioned questions is key to an effective
feasibility study, but such documents also have an invaluable educational role to play within the parent. Bringing onboard the right people can help to “influence some of the assumptions” that go into the study, inform company actors about the potential of the captive entity and—critically—help to encourage the steering of the “ultimate design of the programme”, Lochner said. Furthermore, the study also helps create a “realistic set of expectations as to what a captive can and cannot help an organisation achieve”. As Lochner made clear, not all feasibility studies will point to the creation of a captive entity—captive entities are not after all appropriate for every firm—but by bringing the right people into the process, the potential, scope and challenges presented by captive insurance entities will inevitably be better understood by a wider audience within the parent company.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60