BOOKS SEBASTIAN BARKER
OFF WITH THE SHACKLESOF CERTITUDE
Faith, Hope and Poetry: theology
and the poetic imagination Malcolm Guite ASHGATE PUBLISHING LIMITED, 258PP, £50 Tablet Bookshop price £45
M 01420 592974
alcolm Guite writes as an aca- demic priest harvesting invaluable insights in his closely reasoned study of poetry. He dislikes what he regards as the limitation of our interpre- tation of reality imposed on us by the Enlightenment, which, for him, demanded clarity of expression, rectitude of thought, an absolute precision of meaning. He traces this demand from Francis Bacon and Descartes through to the early Wittgenstein and a flavourless logical positivism. Instead, he cele - brates and embraces ambiguity. It is obvious to him that poetry tells us a great deal more about reality than obsession with the exact. The exact, in short, is a devilish misunder- standing of the multitudinous nature of a thing. So Guite is taking us on a liberating voyage into our poetic inheritance, to escape the shackles of such certitude. He tells his story through crystal clear read-
ing ofThe Dream of the Rood, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, The Tempest, Sir John Davies, John Donne, George Herbert, Henry Vaughan, Milton, Coleridge, Thomas Hardy, Philip Larkin, Geoffrey Hill and Seamus Heaney. In every case, his exegesis is detailed, exhaustive, even at times overcooked, but always attentive to the poetry and illuminating about it. He sees the poetic imagination as much a
THE TABLET BOOKSHOP £1.75 (4 books or more: add £5)
Postage and Packing for books up to 1kg* UK
EUROPE £2.00 per book
REST OF THE WORLD £2.50 per book *P&P for oversized books will be charged at cost
We accept Visa, MasterCard and Switch Cheques payable to Redemptorist Publications
Call:
Email: Post:
01420 592 974 Fax: 01420 888 05
tabletbookshop@rpbooks.co.uk
The Tablet Bookshop, Alphonsus House Chawton, Hampshire GU34 3HQ
Redemptorist Publications will endeavour to sell you the book at the price advertised. However, occasionally on publication the published price is altered,in which case we will notify you prior to debiting your card.
24 | THE TABLET | 1 January 2011
is by no means the ventriloquist’s doll of the poetry he quotes. He brings a refreshing nicety of theology to his outlook, with the result that our experience of poetry is made new again and carried to new frontiers – the most inter- esting of which is poets as technicians of the sacred. “The poetic imagination helps us to see the
part of God as of man: so it is the window through which both see each other. “If part of the Imago Dei is itself our creative imagin - ation then we should expect the action of the Word, indwelling and redeeming fallen humanity, to begin in, and work outward through, the human imagination. If this is so then we should be able to discern the presence of that Word in the works of art which are the fruit of our imagination.” Because Guite is making a serious effort as our guide to what poetry is, it comes as no surprise to hear him say, “In offering a theology of imagination, we need to have some criteria for discerning the ways in which imagination might both lapse into idolatry and unhelpful fantasy, and yet also give us our only possible apprehen- sions of the Kingdom of God.” So what might these criteria be? He detects them in language and the way it is used. “Of most concern to us in making the case for poetic imagination as a truth- bearing faculty is the development of thought about the actual and possible range of refer- ence of language itself.” He makes it clear how far this range of reference may reach: “Poetry may be especially fitted as a medium for helping us apprehend something of the mystery embodied in that phrase ‘the Word was made flesh’.” So language is not some sort of “given”. It is not a collection of data taken up like little bricks by the poet to build a poem. It is the Word become flesh, as in the first chapter of the gospel of St John. For Guite, therefore, language is intimately involved in the interpenetration of transcen- dence and immanence. “Coleridge and Seamus Heaney”, he tells us, “are certainly the two poets whose vision most affects the shape and purpose of this volume.” Although this is true, Guite is draw- ing on his other sources all the time, so that the rich texture of the language he uses is heavily criss-crossed by poetry itself. But he
reality of the unseen.” This remark comes in a discussion of Milton composing poetry when blind. Because of his canny conformity to the special philosophic genius of Coleridge, Guite can without bathos refer to tracing “the full flow of his poetry back to its source in an imagination which is more than the human”. Guite uses Coleridge and Milton, along with all the others, to establish the intellectual rea- sonableness of his claims for poetry. “To read Paradise Lost is to be reminded again of how to read the two great works that God has left us – his Word and his world.” It would be easy to take issue with this on the grounds that Paradise Lost tells us more about politics in the time of the wars of religion than God, his Word, or his world. But that would be to miss the point of this book.
Guite is impressed by Coleridge reflecting on “the experience of having been the mind through which great works of imagination had been revealed”. And he has this to say about it. “In this reflection Coleridge found himself compelled to reject the mechanistic, clockwork cosmos of Newton, to reject the distant and detached clockmaker that passed for God with many of his contemporaries. Instead he rediscovered for himself the mys- terious and suddenly present God who spoke to Moses from the burning bush, the mysteri - ous and all-sustaining Word made flesh at Bethlehem, and the life-giving Holy Spirit through whom the imaginations of poets are kindled.” Nor does he let poets such as Thomas Hardy or Philip Larkin off the hook. He says of Larkin, “The atheist in him is surprised and silenced by the poet who emerges from the depths and takes charge of things.” In detailed analysis of their poems, he carries this point elegantly into our understanding. He rounds off his affirmation of God and the poetic imagination with a subtle and thorough-going look at Seamus Heaney. He places him firmly in the frame of a man “enter- ing heaven/Through the ear of a raindrop”, as in Heaney’s poem “The Rain Stick”. In doing so, he shows Heaney moving from the contemplation of the murderous to the con- templation of the marvellous. The editing of the book is poor. Scholastic footnotes have the page number reference as “p. 000” five times. Philip Larkin becomes Phillip; books are left unitalicised; and we have such howlers as “which is our in inherit - ance”. There are far too many glaring editorial mistakes in such an invaluable book.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40