theregions A The Manila Times
Ampatuan lawyers want witness as respondent
DEFENSE lawyers in the Maguindanao massacre case have sought to compel the Department of Justice to include a witness in the list of respondents. Filed before the Branch 26 of the
Regional Trial Court of Manila was a petition for mandamus against Justice Secretary Leila de Lima, Chief State Prosecutor Claro Arellano and Assistant Chief State Prosecutor Ri- chard Anthony Fadullon to include witness Kenny Dalandag as one of the respondents in the case now being heard by the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City.
A member of the Ampatuans’ pri-
vate army, Dalandag stated in his af- fidavit that Andal Ampatuan Sr. di- rected his son, Andal Jr., to carry out the killing of 57 people last year.
The Ampatuans’ lawyers want Dalandag to be implicated since he also admitted he has participated and implemented the supposed plan to kill the victims.
The hearing of the case will resume tomorrow (December 15) and on Thursday (December 16) at the sala of Judge Jocelyn Solis-Reyes of Branch 221 Regional Trial Court of the Quezon City at the Quezon City Hall of Justice. Testimonies of expert witnesses will be heard at the Regional Trial Court of the Quezon City court- room rather than at the Metro Ma- nila District Jail at Camp Bagong Diwa in Taguig City, where previous hearings were held.
ROMMEL C. LONTAYAO regionsinbrief
SENATE APPROVES BILL INCREASING DH’S SALARIES THE Senate today approved on third and final reading Senate Bill 78, which will increase the minimum wage of house helpers or “kasambahays” and will provide them with additional benefits. Introduced by Sen. Jinggoy Ejercito Estrada, Senate Bill 78, or the “Act of Providing for Additional Benefits and Protection to House Helpers,” requires employers to pay a minimum wage of at least P2,500 to house helpers within Metro Manila, at least P2,000 for those in chartered cities and first class municipalities, and at least P1,500 for those working in third class municipalities.
NPA REBELS FREE HOSTAGES IN DAVAO CITY ZAMBOANGA CITY: New People’s Army (NPA) rebels have freed a government soldier and a militia they held hostage in Davao City, the group’s leader said Monday. NPA leader Leoncio Pitao said the militia, a minor recruited by the military to fight the rebels; and the soldier, Cpl. Fresilo Dosel, were released unharmed in Paquibato district in Davao City after insurgents raided an Army post last week.
DIPOLOG MAYOR NAMED RDC CHAIRMAN ZAMBOANGA CITY: President Benigno Aquino 3rd has appointed Mayor Evelyn Uy of Dipolog City as chairman of the Regional Development Council (RDC) for Western Mindanao. The RDC is a special body tasked to push for the development programs and projects in all regions and works closely with the National Economic and Development Authority in drafting blueprints for regional development in the country. It is composed of local government chief executives, government agency regional directors and private sector representatives. Just this year, the Philippine National Police and the Philippine Army also awarded Uy for her unrelenting support for its various peace and development programs in Dipolog City. Politicians and various business and civil groups praised the appointment of Uy who shall serve for three years.
TUESDAY D e cember 14, 2010 9
Muslims want govt to break impasse on MILF peace talks
BY JULMUNIR I. JANNARAL CORRESPONDENT
OTABATO CITY: A Muslim civil society on Monday urged the government to break the impasse on the peace negotiations between the govern- ment and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
C
“There must be a way to break this impasse between the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front,” according to Maradeka Sec- retary General Nash Pangadapun. “It is certainly not at the expense of the poor people in Mindanao,” Pangadapun said.
He said Maradeka sees in the wis- dom of the “Montesa formula,” as a means to break this impasse in the Philippine government and MILF peace talks. This formula is referred to the one suggested by Bong Montesa, former member of the gov- ernment peace panel who urged both the government and the MILF
to sit down first and settle amicably whether to change the Malaysian facilitator Datuk Othman Razak. Pangadapun recalled that the gov- ernment peace panel chairman, Marvic Leonen urged for the removal of Razak as a third party facilitator. He said the Montesa formula is the most practicable option to get both sides return to the negotiating table. Montesa put on objectively his
observation and recommendations after a deadlock over the Malaysian facilitator and the facilitation proc- ess. Though MILF is definitely sup- porting the Malaysia government as Third Country Facilitator, but the
government was intent on changing Datuk Othman Razak by sending request through the Ministry of For- eign Affairs of Malaysia.
The request according to a diplo- matic source should have been sent directly to the Office of the Prime Minister of Malaysia in Kuala Lumpur for the sake of diplomatic protocol and not merely through their Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which Malaysian themselves took it as a diplomatic insult. Pangadapun said his group in Maradeka and other Moro civil so- ciety groups have already joined hands since they are now wary of the repercussion brought about by this impasse in the peace talks and appealing to both the government and the MILF to resolve once and for all this diplomatic row. He also cautioned both the gov- ernment and the MILF that the ris- ing political tension in the ground could flare up again to a full blown armed conflict. Pangadapun also said that all Moro civil society groups are also
urging President Benigno Aquino 3rd to release all Moro political pris- oners including MILF senior com- mander Edward Guerra from his detention in Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City as a gesture of goodwill in keep- ing up confidence building. He also recalled that Moro civil societies in the town of Sultan Kudarat and Marawi City have staged their own rallies urging the MILF to pullout from the peace talks and at the same time issued the Ranaw Manifesto urging an imme- diate pullout of the of the Islamic front from the peace talks. But Pangadapun said that MILF should not pull out now, as this is not the solution to the problem, adding that both the government and the MILF have to exhaust first all possible and practi- cable means to solve the issue. “We don’t want a bleak scenario to happen and urge the government to act responsibly and put above all the concern of the many especially the thousands of people who will be affected should hostilities resumed again,” Pangadapun further said.
Sulu province finalist to Galing Pook Awards AL JACINTO
ZAMBOANGA CITY: The Sulu provincial Area Coordinating Council has been chosen as one of the finalists for the prestigious Galing Pook Awards. The Area Coordinating Council coordinate Sulu’s various non- governmental agencies, military, police, emergency services and other organizations and serves as an in- ter-agency communication network. It is a facility established as a
AL JACINTO
Court. Where there are extraordinary and very important reasons for filing it with the Court of Appeals, the case shall be endorsed to the SAC Service.
Where an appeal is to be interposed, it must be perfected within forty-eight (48) hours from notice of the
judgment. The records of the case must be transmitted to the SAC Service immediately upon the filing of the notice of appeal.
Section 7. Appeals by the Adverse Party. – Where the adverse party appeals, the records of the case shall be
forwarded to the SAC Service immediately upon knowledge of the perfection of the appeal, or filing of the petition or appeal memorandum by the adverse party.
Section 8. SAC Service Responsibilities. – While the initial evaluation of the merit and propriety of an appeal
are made at the District Office level, it is the SAC Service which shall finally decide if the appeal is justified, and whether the theory adopted, issues raised and mode of appeal availed of, by the trial lawyer are proper.
If the SAC Service finds no merit in the appeal, or believes the course of action adopted is not proper, and can no longer be remedied, the corresponding recommendation to consider the case as terminated, shall be submitted to the Chief Public Attorney for his/her approval.
The SAC Service shall only enter its appearance once it receives the complete records of the case. Such appearance in substitution of the trial lawyer, will relieve the latter of responsibilities attendant to the case.
It is the duty of the SAC Service to furnish the field lawyer or his District Head, with a copy of the decision the
moment it receives the same from the Appellate Court. Section 9. Monitoring of Compliance with Guidelines. – The SAC Service shall closely monitor compliance
by field lawyers with this Article (Article VIII). Whenever necessary, their attention shall be called regarding requirements that have not been met, or of any violations that may have been committed. It shall apprise the Regional Public Attorney and the Chief Public Attorney, of such violations or shortcomings.
Section 10. Miscellaneous Provisions. – PAO lawyers must not file a Notice of Appeal for an accused who jumped bail, escaped or who is a fugitive from justice, unless he surrendered or posted bail pending appeal. Proof of such surrender or posting of bail shall be attached to the records transmitted to the SAC Service. (People vs. Maria Luna Gonzales, CA-G.R. CR. NO. 08821, September 6, 1990, citing People vs. Patajo, 57718, November 20, 1988, en banc. Minute Resolution).
ARTICLE X NON-JUDICIAL SERVICES
Section 1. Coverage. – The following are classified as Non-Judicial Services: 1. Instant Services: a. Legal counseling and documentation; b. Administering oaths; and b. Mediation and conciliation of disputes.
2. Outreach Activities: a. Assistance to persons undergoing police interrogation or persons under detention and inquest proceedings; b. Jail visitations; and c. Barangay outreach programs.
Section 2. Counseling – Requests for legal advice or counseling by phone or in person should be acted upon
immediately, unless the problem presented requires further study and research, in which case the clients should be advised to call back or return within 5 working days by which time, the lawyer on the case should be ready with his advice or opinion. Requests for advice or opinion shall not be subjected to the merit test, but care should be taken that affluent persons do not avail of PAO services.
Section 3. Documentation. – Requests for the preparation of affidavits, notices, and other documents must
be attended to immediately. Included in this service is administering oaths pursuant to Republic Act 9406. Requests for documentation
services shall not be subjected to the merit test, and neither shall it be necessary to accomplish the Interview Sheet. Again, care should be taken that documentation services are availed of only by indigents. Hence, requests for the preparation of deeds of sale of real properties and other commercial documents shall be denied.
Section 4. Mediation, Arbitration and Conciliation. – Requests for legal assistance in justiciable civil matters, shall first be evaluated by the District Public Attorney/Officer-in-Charge for the purpose of determining whether the issues could possibly be resolved through mediation or conciliation. In the affirmative, the case shall be assigned to a lawyer of the District, who shall immediately schedule the same for mediation conference, notifying both parties thereof. Conferences shall be within 3 months from acceptance of the case.
4.1 Public Attorneys conducting mediation or conciliation conferences, shall always maintain strict neutrality. They shall encourage the parties to come to an agreement. If a settlement is reached, the lawyer shall prepare a compromise agreement for the signature of the parties. If no agreement is arrived at, the lawyer shall determine whether or not a case should be filed on behalf of the applicant, and submit his/her recommendation to the District Head, who shall decide the matter. If a decision to file a case is reached, the matter shall be transferred to the Judicial Cases record of the District.
4.2. Requests for assistance under this category are subject to the merit and indigency tests, hence, the Interview Sheet must be accomplished.
Section 5. Authority to Administer Oaths. – Public Attorneys shall have the general authority to administer
oaths in connection with the performance of their official duty free of charge. 5.1. In administering oaths, the Public Attorney shall use the following format:
NAME OF PAO LAWYER POSITION/DESIGNATION (Pursuant to R.A. No. 9406)
5.2. Recording of Oaths Administered. – Every Public Attorney shall maintain a separate record book as register of all the oaths administered, indicating the date thereof, brief description of the document, name of the swearing party, and witnesses, if any.
5.3. Reportorial Requirement. – Every Public Attorney, exercising the authority to administer oath, shall submit a monthly report of the oaths administered, to the Field Operations and Statistic Service.
Section 6. Outreach Activities. – The main thrust of the legal aid delivery program of the PAO is to enable
the marginalized sector of society to have access to counsel when needed. In carrying out this mission, Public Attorneys shall reach out beyond the confines of their offices, and make access to counsel visible to those who need our legal service. Regional and District Heads, should institutionalize in their respective Regions and Districts, a dynamic inquest program and regular jail visitations.
6.1. Custodial Interrogation and Inquest Investigation. – District Heads shall ensure that a Public Attorney is available to assist arrested persons during custodial interrogations and inquest investigations. For these purposes, they shall coordinate with Precinct Commanders, other police authorities and Prosecutors in their respective Districts.
a. Public Attorneys shall see to it that the persons assisted are informed of their constitutional rights, before the start of the custodial interrogation, and shall be present at all stages thereof. Should the client agree to execute a statement, he/she shall be apprised of the consequences thereof, and informed that he/she is under no compulsion to sign the same.
b. The inquest lawyer shall see to it that due process is accorded the arrested person during an inquest investigation. When proper, he/she shall assist the client in effecting a compromise with the complainant
proactive, reactive, and post conflict mechanism to address various concerns at regional and local levels of govern- ance and to solve problems of coordi- nation and response, said Gov. Sakur Tan of Sulu, who is also the chairman
of the Area Coordinating Council. “It also functions both as a system and as a council for planning, inte- grating, directing, supervising, and implementing line-up government programs and projects particularly on political, socioeconomic, cultural, religious, development, security and information issues,” said Fazlur- Rahman Abdulla, executive director of the Area Coordinating Council. He said the United States govern- ment also funded some of the con- struction of buildings use as head- quarters of the Area Coordinating Council in Sulu. There are at least 20 Area Coordinating Council
to avoid court litigation. He/she shall move for the dropping of the case, if warranted by the evidence, or the submission of the case to the Prosecutor’s Office for preliminary investigation.
6.2. Jail Visitation Activities. – Every Regional Public Attorney, Provincial, City and Municipal District Attorney, shall see to it that jails within his/her Region, Province, City or Municipality, are visited at least twice a month for the purpose of determining:
a. Those detained without legal counsel; and
b. Those in custody beyond the period equal to, or more than the maximum/minimum imposable penalty for the offense charged.
Those who have been detained for a period equal to, or more than the maximum imposable penalty for the offense charged, or for a period equal to, or more than the minimum of the imposable principal penalty, should be informed, that through a proper motion, they could be released pending trial or appeal, or that they could be released on a reduced bail, or on their own recognizance, as the case may be (Article 29, Revised Penal Code). The discovery of such a situation, should be relayed to the counsel de parte of the detention prisoner, if he/she is so represented, otherwise, the PAO resident lawyer should be informed of this fact for immediate action, to effect the release of the detained prisoner.
6.3. Barangay legal information dissemination and outreach program. ARTICLE XI
RECORDING AND REPORTING OF CASES AND SERVICES Section 1. Recording. - All requests for legal assistance shall have to be recorded, as follows:
a. The Interview Sheet shall be filled-up by the Interviewer, and signed by the client. The accomplished Interview Sheet shall be attached to the case folder;
b. The control number assigned to the case shall appear in all the forms. Assignment of numbers shall be in the sequence of receipt of cases, regardless of classification, thus, there should be no separate control numbers for judicial and non-judicial cases;
c. Accepted applications shall be recorded in a logbook, at the Provincial, City, Municipal District Offices or Line Services. The logbook shall contain columns for the following data: name of client, date the application was received, PAO Control Number, name of lawyer to whom the case was assigned, nature of case or cause of action, cause of termination, and date of termination;
d. Transfer of cases duly approved by the Provincial, City, Municipal Public Attorneys or Service Heads, shall be recorded in PAO Form No.2-F. This contingency arises when there are changes in court assignments of lawyers, or cases are re-raffled to other branches of the court, when the lawyer assigned retires, transfers to another office, resigns or files an application for leave for more than five (5) days, or other similar situations. The original shall be submitted to the District Head as office file, the duplicate to the transferor and the third copy to the transferee;
e. PAO Form No. 4 (Case History) shall be attached to the case folder, for recording of every development of the case, such as dates of hearing, the witnesses presented on direct or cross-examination, and documents marked as exhibits;
f. Custodial interrogation and Inquest Investigation Services shall be entered in PAO Form No. 5, which shall reflect the date, name of person assisted, offense charged, and place where the services were rendered;
g. Jail visitation activities shall be recorded in PAO Form No. 6, which shall contain the following: the person visited, detainees interviewed and action taken on their problem, if any.
Section 2. Reporting. – All lawyers are required to submit the following reports:
a. Monthly Reports. – Public Attorneys shall submit monthly, in triplicate, to the Provincial, City, Municipal District Public Attorney or Service Heads, within the first three (3) working days of the succeeding month, a statistical report of their judicial, quasi-judicial and non-judicial services, as well as limited services and outreach activities, on Monitoring Form No. 01. The Unit Head shall immediately transmit the original of the reports, including his/her own, to the Field Operations and Statistics Service (FOSS), furnishing the Regional Public Attorney with a copy thereof. A copy shall be retained by the District Office.
b. Year-end Reports. – A year-end inventory of pending judicial and non-judicial cases, as well as limited services and outreach activities, shall be submitted to the Provincial, City, Municipal District Public Attorney or Service Heads, within the first five (5) working days of the succeeding year, on PAO Form No. 8. The Provincial, City, Municipal District Public Attorney or Service Head s, shall immediately submit within three (3) working days, the original of the reports, including his/her own, to the Field Operations and Statistics Service, furnishing the Regional Public Attorney a copy thereof. A copy shall be retained by the District. The Regional Public Attorneys, shall submit within three (3) working days after receipt from the district offices, a consolidated year-end report to the Field Operations and Statistics Service.
ARTICLE XII LITIGATION EXPENSE AND SUCCESS FEES Section 1. Exemption from Fees and Costs of the Suit. – The clients of the PAO shall be exempt from payment
of docket, court fees and other fees, incidental to instituting an action in court, and other quasi-judicial bodies, as an original proceeding or on appeal. (Section 6 [paragraph 5], R.A. 9406)
Section 2. Exemption from Filing Fees for Complaints filed before the Prosecutor’s Office. – Consistent with the Memorandum dated January 4, 2005 issued by then Secretary of Justice Raul M. Gonzalez as reiterated in Department Circular No. 46 dated June 25, 2010 issued by then Secretary Alberto C. Agra, indigent litigants assisted by the Public Attorney’s Office, are exempted from payment of filing fees for complaints filed before the Prosecutor’s Office.
tion 3. Costs of suit, attorney’s fees and contingent fees. – The costs of the suit, attorney’s fees and contingent fees, imposed upon the adversary of the PAO clients after a successful litigation, shall be deposited to the National Treasury as trust fund, and shall be disbursed for special allowances of authorized officials and lawyers of the PAO. (Section 6 [paragraph 6], R.A. 9406)
Section 4. The handling PAO lawyer shall file a request with the Office of the Clerk of Court of the Metropolitan
Trial Court, Metropolitan Circuit Trial Court, Regional Trial Court, Court of Appeals, Supreme Court and cashiers/sheriffs of the National Labor Relations Commission/Department of Labor and Employment and other quasi-judicial bodies, to issue the proper receipt to the losing party, with regards to the payment of contingent fees and attorney’s fees adjudged in favor of the PAO client, and shall immediately turn-over the same to the PAO cashier to be deposited to the National Treasury.
ARTICLE XIII FRANKING PRIVILEGES Section 1. Franking Privilege. - The PAO may transmit through ordinary mail and/or registered mail with return
card, free of charge, all official communications and papers directly connected with the conduct of its duties, functions and/or its exercise of administrative supervision over its personnel. (Section 6 [paragraph 8], R.A. 9406)
Section 2. Form. – The envelope or wrapper of the privileged mail matter shall bear on the left upper corner,
“Public Attorney” together with its address, and on the right upper corner, the words “Private or unauthorized use to avoid payment of postage is penalized by fine or imprisonment, or both.” (Section 6 [paragraph 9], R.A. 9406)
Section 3. Provision of envelopes and rubber stamps. – The PAO shall provide for the standard mailing envelope and the standard rubber stamp for purposes of compliance with the preceding section.
Section 4. Recording of Outgoing Mails. – Every Service, Regional and District Office, shall maintain a separate
logbook to serve as record of all official communications sent either through ordinary mail and/or registered mail with return card, free of charge, indicating therein, the date of mailing, brief description of the mail matter and the registry receipt number, as the case may be.
ARTICLE XIV
PERSIDA V. RUEDA-ACOSTA Chief Public Attorney
across the province.
“This Area Coordinating Council is the brainchild of our Governor Sakur Tan, of his innovative govern- ance. This is a convergence of all stakeholders in Sulu, of our peace and development efforts, all for the people of this province. It is a con- vergent zone for every stakeholder of peace and development in the prov- ince and catapulting point for shared actions,” Abdulla said, adding, Tan was behind the establishment of the Area Coordinating Council in all the province’s 19 towns. The Galing Pook Awards was launched in 1993 as a pioneering
program that searches and recog- nizes innovative practices by local governments. Finalists with out- standing initiatives are carefully se- lected and winners recognized in a very prestigious awards ceremony. Galing Pook traces its beginnings in 1993 when the first Gantimpalang Panglingkod Pook was held. The Awards Program was a joint initiative of the Local Government Academy- Department of the Interior and Local Government, the Ford Foundation, and other individual advocates of good governance from the academe, civil society and the government. AL JACINTO
RULE OF CONDUCT Section 1. Rule of Conduct for Public Attorneys. - Public Attorneys should primarily play the role of peacemakers.
They must be guided by a high sense of fairness, integrity, good faith and justice, in the performance of their functions. Cases must be evaluated that only the meritorious ones are entertained, and only deserving persons are extended free legal assistance.
Section 2. In rendering legal services to the needy, Public Attorneys must give the fullest measure of assistance. PAO lawyers must be courteous in their language and demeanor towards clients and the general public. Our
avowed policy should be “prompt service with a smile”. Section 3. No Public Attorney shall take custody of cash or valuables of a client. If there are fees to be paid, the
client should be the one to pay. In amicable settlements, the PAO lawyer should refrain from taking custody of any money or valuables which is/are the object/s or subject/s of settlement.
Acceptance of “pasalubong” or gifts from clients is punishable under RA 6713 (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees), and should, therefore, be strictly avoided.
ARTICLE XV SANCTIONS
Section 1. Administrative Sanction – Disciplinary action in accordance with the existing Civil Service Laws, rules and regulations shall be taken against a PAO lawyer and employee who commits any of the following acts:
a. Handles cases of persons who are not qualified for legal services under the indigency test, or those who are not entitled to services specifically mentioned in Rule VI (Free Legal Services) of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of R.A. 9406;
b. Handles cases outside of his/her court residency assignment, without appropriate written authorization; c. Fails to submit monthly and year-end report on time; d. Travels abroad without securing a Permit/Authority to Travel Abroad from the Chief Public Attorney;
e. Fails to transmit records of cases to the Special and Appealed Cases Service within the specified time- frame prescribed herein;
f. Handles appealed cases in the Appellate Courts, if he/she is a field lawyer; g. Fails to perfect an appeal on time to the prejudice or interest of the client; h. Failure to attend inquest duty without valid reason; and
i. Any other violations in accordance with the PAO and Civil Service Rules and Regulations. and R.A. No. 6713.
ARTICLE XV FINAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Repealing Clause. – All circulars and memoranda, or any portion thereof, inconsistent herewith, are hereby repealed or modified accordingly.
Section 2. Effectivity. – This PAO Operations Manual shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in a newspaper of general circulation. Signed in Cebu City for Manila, Metro Manila on the 27th
of August 2010.
PERSIDA V. RUEDA-ACOSTA Chief Public Attorney
WE, the undersigned Officials of the PUBLIC ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, do hereby pesent and ratify the PUBLIC ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OPERATIONS MANUAL, this 27th
(SGD.) SILVESTRE A. MOSING Deputy Chief Public Attorney for Visayas & Mindanao
(SGD.) CYNTHIA M. VARGAS Regional Public Attorney National Capital Region
(SGD.) TOMAS B. PADILLA Regional Public Attorney Region I
(SGD.) SALVADOR S. HIPOLITO Regional Public Attorney Region III
(SGD.) DIOSDADO S. SAVELLANO Regional Public Attorney MIMAROPA
(SGD.) CALIXTO S. PEREZ Officer-in-Charge Region VI
(SGD.) FLORENCIO M. DILOY Regional Public Attorney Region VIII
(SGD.) EDGARDO D. GONZALES Regional Public Attorney Zamboanga Peninsula
(SGD.) FRANCIS A. CALATRAVA Regional Public Attorney Davao Region
day of August, 2010, at the Marco Polo Hotel, Cebu City, Philippines. (SGD.) MACAPANGCAT A. MAMA
Deputy Chief Public Attorney for Luzon
(SGD.) FRISCO F. DOMALSIN Regional Public Attorney
Cordillera Administrative Region (SGD.) RENATO T. CABRIDO
Regional Public Attorney Region II
(SGD.) ELPIDIO C. BACUYAG Regional Public Attorney CALABARZON
(SGD.) RAMON N. GOMEZ Regional Public Attorney Region V
(SGD.) MA. G-REE R. CALINAWAN Regional Public Attorney Region VII
(SGD.) NORLAINE M. CAPAL-AMPASO Officer-in-Charge
Autonomous Region for Muslim Mindanao (SGD.) NUNILA P. GARCIA
Regional Public Attorney Northern Mindanao
(SGD.) DATUMANONG A. DUMAMBA Regional Public Attorney SOCCSKSARGEN
(SGD.) EDGAR Q. BALANSAG Regional Public Attorney Caraga Region
Approved:
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18