This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Page 69


25 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

The actuaries have recommended a normal future annual contribution rate of 12.8% of gross taxable pay of members, together with an additional £8.1m per year in respect of the past-service deficit arising from the actuarial valuation. The next triennial actuarial valuation of the fund will take place as at 31 March 2010.

As explained in note 8, there is also a senior pension scheme which provides additional benefits to certain members of senior management. The actuaries have recommended a contribution of £1.4m for the year to 29 January 2011.

The contributions expected to be paid to the pension schemes during the year to 29 January 2011 amount to £101m.

Pension commitments have been calculated based on the most recent actuarial valuations, as at 31 March 2007, which have been updated by the actuaries to assess the assets and liabilities of the schemes as at 30 January 2010.

Scheme assets are stated at market values at 30 January 2010. The following financial assumptions have been used:

2010 2009

Future price inflation 3.25% 3.50%
Discount rate 5.70% 6.90%
Expected return on assets 7.80% 8.20%
Increases in earnings 3.75% 4.50%
Increases in pensions 3.25% 3.50%

The expected return on assets is a weighted average of the individual asset categories and their expected rates of return, which are determined by consideration of historical experience and current market factors. Increases in earnings are projected at 0.5% above inflation, with increases in pensions being in line with inflation.

The financial assumption which has the most significant effect on the valuation of scheme liabilities and the current service cost is the real discount rate, i.e. the discount rate less the rate of future price inflation. A movement in the real discount rate of 0.10% would have the effect of increasing or decreasing the IAS 19 defined benefit obligation by circa £50m, and would increase or decrease the current service cost by circa £2.5m.

The post-retirement mortality assumptions used in valuing the pensions liabilities were based on the “00” series standard tables for all retirements, together with medium cohort improvement factors with a year of use of 2007, adjusted by half a year to reflect the outcome of a mortality study. It is assumed that younger members will live longer in retirement than older members. This reflects the expectation that mortality rates will continue to fall over time.

The average life expectancies assumed were as follows:

2010 2009
Men Women Men Women

Average life expectancy (in years) for a 60-year-old 26.0 28.4 26.0 28.4

Average life expectancy (in years) at age 60,
for a 40-year-old 27.3 29.5 27.3 29.5

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com