MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2010

KLMNO

S

C9

ALESSANDRA TARANTINO/ASSOCIATED PRESS

UNDER FIRE: California lawyer Jeffrey Lena is defending Vatican officials, including Pope Benedict XVI and Catholic cardinals, in the courts of law and public opinion in the United States.

On a mission to defend the Catholic Church

lena from C1

Puffy bags hung under Lena’s brown

eyes on Wednesday morning as he or- dered an herbal pomegranate tea at a Washington coffee shop. With waves of salt-and-pepper hair, a workman’s build, unclipped fingernails and an outfit of plaid flannel shirt, bluejeans and black shoes, Lena doesn’t look the part of ad- vocate for the supreme pontiff of the uni- versal church, prince of the apostles and vicar of Jesus Christ on Earth. The genesis of Lena’s employment with

the Vatican is an enduring church mys- tery upon which he refuses to shed any light. “I’ve never wished to be in the public

eye,” says Lena, who once spent three hours hiding out in an empty Austin courtroom to avoid photographers. “And this is like suddenly crossing a divide from a private to public figure, and I wish to retain my privacy.” Some of Lena’s former opponents say he is in way over his head and does not possess the legal heft to command such complex and historic cases. Victims’ groups say Lena’s deft naviga- tion of legal loopholes is anathema to an institution built on the revelation of truth. But Vatican supporters say he is ef- fective, and that his immunity defense has broader applications for interna- tional law beyond the current scandal. What is clear is that through his newly voluble response to media inquiries about the Vatican’s actions, the down-to- earth lawyer has emerged as the pope’s de facto spokesman.

Shy, cerebral, athletic

Lena lives with his wife and son in a

Berkeley Hills home that had no televi- sion until this past Christmas. His family has owned the property since the 1960s. His grandfather, Lino Lena, emigrated from Italy; his father, Leland, a public- school teacher, participated in the in- vasion of the Philippines as a Coast Guardsman. Raised Catholic, Lena and his two

younger siblings accompanied his par- ents to Sunday Mass and hunted for Eas- ter eggs. Lena was a shy, “cerebral” and “athletic” young man, according to his brother Justin, now living in South Dako- ta. He lettered in tennis and took Latin lessons. As the Lenas raised their family in

Berkeley in the 1960s, John XXIII, affec- tionately known as the “Good Pope,” is- sued a 1962 policy focused on the high church crime of solicitation of indecent acts during confession and the “foulest crime,” concerning clerics who have acted obscenely toward other men, children or “brute animals.” A central concern in the Catholic Church has long been to protect priests from the whims of powerful bish- ops who could punish them for express- ing opposing viewpoints. The policy em- phasized secrecy within the church, but also from civil authorities for whom the severe church punishment of defrocking a priest is a veritable slap on the wrist. Questions about the relative powers of canon and civil law couldn’t have been farther from Lena’s mind as he grew up in Northern California. He got good grades in high school, but he says he cared more about sports. After graduation, he

worked in construction and helped his cousin build a house in the Oakland Hills. He became more intellectually curious

at the University of California at Santa Cruz, from which he graduated in 1982, and earned his MA in history from the University of California at Berkeley in 1986, specializing in the roles different re- ligious traditions played in shaping American history. According to the uni- versity’s alumni association, the lone ac- tivity listed under his name at Berkeley was “reading/study.” In 1988 he married Adele D’Alessando,

of Milan, and became a candidate for a PhD in history; he completed the course work and oral exams but never delivered his thesis. Instead, he started teaching history at Berkeley and the University of Maryland.

Amove to law

In 1993, Lena enrolled in Hastings Col-

lege of the Law, where he became friends with Ugo Mattei, a renowned Italian legal scholar whom Lena calls a “master” of comparative law. With Mattei’s help, Lena transferred to

Berkeley’s law school and studied at the University of Milan. After completing his law degree, Lena returned to Italy in 1996 as a visiting professor in the country’s universities.

According to Luisa Antoniolli, a com-

parative law professor at the University of Trento in Italy who was friendly with Le- na, he was always busy, lagging behind on work and popular with faculty and stu- dents. (She says that one anonymous evaluation at the end of his course read, “You are very beautiful but you should change your glasses.”) Antoniolli says that the last time she

saw Lena he had already taken on some of the Vatican cases, a development that surprised her. “The Vatican doesn’t sound like the exact place where Jeff would real- ly feel at home,” she says. “Not at all.” Somewhere along the line in Italy, Lena established a life-altering relationship with the Holy See. Lena says he became counsel to the Vatican through “academic and professional associations in Italy” and declined repeated requests to explain the connection. Mattei, who has since fallen out with

Lena, claims to be the link. “I involved him with the Vatican for some cases in the U.S. unrelated to the current issues,” said Mattei in an e-mail message. He added, “We worked inten- sively together for the Vatican for a cou- ple, maybe three years, but all of that was with the former Pope and Secretary of State.”

But Mattei, who has called the Italian communist Il Manifesto his favorite newspaper, is an odd person to have con- nected Lena to the Vatican. “Mattei is a pretty left-wing guy,” says Antonio Gidi, who co-wrote a book on comparative law with Mattei. Gidi points out that Mattei had also co-written “Plunder” with Laura Nader, the sister of Ralph Nader. “He is as far away from the pope as you can get.” A source with better understanding of the situation, but who is not authorized to speak publicly on the issue, says that Mattei put Lena in touch with Franzo Grande Stevens, a top Italian lawyer who represented the late Fiat chairman Gian- ni Agnelli, and that he chose Lena to de-

fend the Vatican Bank.

No religious ‘litmus test’

Lena says there was never a religious

“litmus test” for him to join the Vatican’s defense in 2000. “He got hired in those cases because

they needed somebody,” says Mark Chop- ko, who was general counsel for the Unit- ed States Conference of Catholic Bishops between 1987 and 2007, and who now works for a private firm in Washington. “Commercial litigation is very labor-in- tensive; the people in charge of the insti- tutions in Rome needed a commercial lit- igator.” Lena views his defense of the Vatican under an overarching principle that a state should have jurisdiction over a for- eign sovereign only when harmful con- duct is actually attributable to the foreign government. If a state reaches out to take jurisdiction over another country, the delicate balance of international power can be undermined. “Just because a sovereign is small,” Le-

na says, “it does not mean that its rights in this regard should be trampled upon.” “Often an immunity argument seems unfair in the specific case,” says Paul Clement, who served as U.S. solicitor gen- eral between 2005 and 2008 and who is assisting Lena on the U.S. Supreme Court aspects of the Oregon case. “But it is for a broader policy goal.” Not everyone is impressed with Lena’s

ideas. Lee Boyd, a lawyer with the California

law firm of Howarth and Smith who worked for the plaintiffs in the Vatican Bank case, says she was astonished that the Holy See used Lena as its counsel. “He’s not your typical aggressive, showy trial lawyer; he tends to be passive in the courtroom,” she says. “He’s not a big-time lawyer. He seems like a small- town lawyer and doesn’t seem to get the larger issues. I don’t know if he would make it in the high-stakes world that I op- erate in with the big firms. He’s not in that league, not in that caliber at all. I’ve al- ways been curious why Jeff Lena has the Vatican and not a big firm like the other sovereigns hire. It’s a mystery to me.”

“Just because a sovereign is small, it does not mean that its rights . . . should be trampled upon.”

— Jeffrey Lena

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found

that some property claims could not be excluded under the political question doctrine, but the Vatican Bank ultimately prevailed in avoiding jurisdiction on the grounds of Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act.

(“She may be upset because I defeated

her,” Lena says of Boyd. “Notwithstanding the fact that I am unassuming in manner and do not engage in grandstanding.”)

Sex abuse scandal erupts

While the Vatican Bank case in Califor- nia unfolded, a sex abuse scandal swept over the American church. The public scrutiny and widespread depiction of the church hierarchy as protecting criminal priests led to American bishops arguing for and ultimately persuading the Vatican to accept new norms that established zero tolerance for abusive priests in the United States. In 2002, the abuse victims’ lawyer Jeff

Anderson brought John V. Doe v. the Holy

See in Portland, Ore. After many years of litigation, the 9th Circuit Court of Ap- peals ruled that Vatican did not have blanket immunity under the Foreign Sov- ereign Immunity Act because of an excep- tion for harm suffered at the hand of a foreign entity in the United States. “The Vatican controls the operation of the priests,” Anderson says. The appellate court ruled that it would be possible to proceed on the theory that the priest is a direct employee of the Holy See, though many lawyers believe such an argument is difficult to prove. Lena then petitioned the U.S. Supreme

Court to have the departments of State and Justice weigh in on the case. On March 12, Anderson argued in Washing- ton before Solicitor General Elena Kagan, rumored to be a top candidate for the up- coming vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court. Anderson says that, as he walked out, Lena was waiting outside. They shook hands and then the Vatican’s coun- sel went in to argue the Holy See’s side. “He’s always been kind of an enigma,”

says Anderson, who called Lena a formi- dable, civil adversary. “In going after the bishops, I always got these white-glove firms, a gazillion lawyers, the people who represent corporate America. Here, Jeff’s in the lead role.”

Cases keep coming

By 2003, Pope Benedict XVI, who was still known as Joseph Ratzinger and was prefect of the Holy See’s watchdog con- gregation, had taken a more aggressive and hands-on approach to the disciplin- ing of alleged abusers. But the cases kept coming. In 2005, abuse victims filed a putative class action lawsuit in Kentucky, which does not have the burden of proving that priests are em- ployees of the Vatican. In that case, the plaintiffs are trying to show that negli- gent bishops, in their capacity as Vatican officials, caused injury on U.S. soil by fail- ing to report predatory priests to civilian authorities. Lena was able to slow the case down by arguing that documents served to the Vatican were in sloppy Latin and needed to be retranslated. Ultimately, though, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Vatican does not have total im- munity and the case could continue un-

der the theory that, assuming a tort was committed, bishops could be legally con- sidered officials of the Vatican. That legal determination could eventually expose top Vatican prelates to accountability in U.S. courts. The plaintiff’s attorney, Bill McMurry, is also seeking to depose Benedict. Last month, Lena filed documents with

the U.S. District Court in Louisville claim- ing that the pope is immune from the ju- risdiction of United States courts because he is the head of a sovereign state; Lena also is claiming that American bishops are not employees of the Vatican. Lena also will dispute that the 1962 church pol- icy required clerics to keep sex abuse cases secret from civil authorities. Mc- Murry says he thought Lena was an able lawyer, though when he first discovered that the relative legal novice would be lead counsel for the Holy See, “I thought it was a hoax.” (“Ask him if he thinks it’s a hoax any-

more,” Lena says.) Lena is now a familiar face to the top

Vatican power brokers. In 2006, Lena oversaw the deposition of William J. Le- vada, who succeeded Ratzinger as the prefect of the Congregation for the Doc- trine of the Faith, as part of a bankruptcy proceeding against the archdiocese of Portland, Ore. In the deposition, Lena set the ground rules so that Cardinal Levada answered questions regarding his activ- ities when he was archbishop of Portland, but not questions touching on his work as a Vatican official.

Since then, the clerical abuse that Ben-

edict has lamented as “filth,” and the re- sulting lawsuits that many prefects in Rome once considered endemic to a uniquely “litigious” American culture, is now at the doors of St. Peter’s. According to several church insiders,

Lena has expressed frustration that Vati- can officials in Rome have failed to get the church’s point across clearly, that too many cardinals were chiming in off- message and that the church had to speak out more because the lawyers on the oth- er side were speaking out. “In my conversations with Jeff, it ap- pears that he has become very instru- mental as a spokesperson for the Vatican in terms of public relations, they are now leaning on Jeff for advice and counsel,” McMurry says. “I do know that recently he was a bit frustrated that these docu- ments were making their way into the press, that Jeff was really torn that he needed to stay home and write a brief when he really needed to be at the Vatican taking care of damage control.” “For me it’s not damage control, it’s providing counsel,” Lena says. “The frus- tration does not come from statements of individuals who are, of course, free to speak their piece. The frustration comes from the media’s over-attribution — mis- attribution, in fact — of individuals’ views directly to the Holy See.” The Vatican seems to be getting Lena’s

message. Last week, the Holy See posted online a new guideline to its bishops around the world that, to some who have worked with him, sounded a lot like Lena pushing the church into the future: “Civil law concerning reporting of crimes to the appropriate authorities should always be followed.”

horowitzj@washpost.com Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56