This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Sustainable Mountain Development No. 56, ICIMOD, Winter 2009
to work with upland communities in Kulekhani and the
hydropower plant authorities to foster a win-win situation
based on a PES mechanism (Upadhyaya 2005). The
RUPES programme empowered local communities
and organised them into a Watershed Conservation
and Development Forum to promote the conservation
of forested lands in the upland watershed to reduce
siltation. The aim was for the electricity authority to
fi nance the activities through a PES mechanism with the
upland people living in the catchment area receiving
a payment from the hydropower plant in return for the
community managed forests they conserve.
The Kulekhani watershed: a mosaic of different land uses
RUPES was successful in establishing a payment
mechanism channelled through the district development
to unsustainable land management practices, but
committee (DDC) based on the 1999 Local Self-
the demand for such services is increasing. The PES
Governance Act and the 1992 Decentralisation Act.
mechanism is an evolving policy instrument that offers
The Nepal Electricity Authority pays the upland farmers
innovative solutions by offering incentives to promote
for implementing the conservation activities via the
sustainable land management. The Kulekhani case
central government, which allocates 12% of the royalties
shows that a reward system for upland farmers that
generated from the Kulehkani plant to Makwanpur DDC
leads to reduced siltation and enhanced water storage
under the Environment Management Special Fund.
capacity can be implemented, although more needs to
Of this, 50% is allocated to the village development
be done to ensure that the desired outcome is achieved.
committees (VDCs) in Makwanpur District and the
This is the beginning of a paradigm shift in natural
remainder to upland settlements (20%), downstream
resource management in Nepal. The drawing of lessons
settlements (15%), and the VDCs that house the power
from the Kulekhani case to formulate national policies in
plant, generator, dam, and reservoir (15%).
Nepal is underway.
The Kulekhani case refl ects the start of a paradigm shift
References
in Nepal, with the government taking action to introduce
PES. So far, three annual payments have been made.
Adhikari, B (2009) Market-based approaches to environmental
management: A review of lessons from payment for
The VDCs, together with other local bodies such as civil
environmental services in Asia, ADBI Working Paper 134.
society groups, political parties, and NGOs, organise
Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available at www.
themselves to formulate a plan which is discussed at
adbi.org/workingpaper/2009/03/26/2906.market.based.
village level meetings and then presented to the DDC for approaches.environmental.mngt/
approval for fi nancing according to the agreed allocation.
Amatya, UB (2004) Rainstorm induced soil erosion in
The budget is in addition to the regular VDC budget and
Kulekhani watershed and infl ow analysis in Kulekhani Reservoir.
depends on the power generated from the plant.
Kathmandu: Winrock International
So far, much of the payment has been used by the local
Ghimire, BN (2004) Economic losses to Kulekhani
Hydroelectric Project due to siltation in the reservoir.
population for rural development work of immediate
Kathmandu: Winrock International
benefi t, such as village electrifi cation and road
Sangroula, DP (2006) ‘Hydropower development and its
construction. While the payments, in principle, should be
sustainability with respect to sedimentation in Nepal.’ Journal of
used for activities that reduce soil erosion and siltation,
the Institute of Engineering 7(1): 1-9
this has not yet happened. Village politics often lead to
Sthapit, KM (1996) Sedimentation monitoring of Kulekhani
short-term gains over long-term benefi ts, and forest user
reservoir. Paper presented at the Int. Conference on Reservoir
groups have not been able to benefi t as planned. PES
Sedimentation, 9-13 September 1996, Fort Collins, Colorado
is still in its experimentation and learning phase, now
Upadhyaya, S (2005) Payments for environmental services:
attention and follow-up is required to institutionalise the
Sharing hydropower benefi ts with upland communities, RUPES
PES concept at the grass roots level.
Working Paper 1. Kathmandu: Winrock International
WAC (no date) RUPES. Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre
Conclusion
SEARO. Available at http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sea/
Globally, the services that watersheds provide in terms
networks/rupes/index.asp
of quality and quantity of water are decreasing due
33
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com