Transcript ≤1.11 Part 1
LECTURER: Good afternoon, everyone. I’m glad to see such a good turnout today, because we have a visiting speaker, Dr Michael Todd, who’s going to talk about his work as an occupational psychologist. As you probably already know, occupational psychologists are also known as work – or organizational – psychologists. They have many roles: counsellor, problem solver, organization designer, team builder and investigator. This afternoon, Michael is going to give us an example of some of the things he does in his job. So, by the end of the lecture, I hope you’ll have a realistic picture of what’s involved in practising occupational psychology and maybe even some thoughts on whether it would suit you as a profession. Now I’ll hand over to Michael.
DR TODD: Good afternoon, and thank you for inviting me. As Dr Freeman said, occupational psychologists work in many different capacities. I work in the Human Resources department of a large university, where one of my responsibilities is to support the university’s equality and diversity policy, which ensures that all employees are treated fairly. This afternoon, I’m going to describe a project I’ve been working on recently: investigating the reason why there are so few women in senior posts at the university.
≤Exercise C
Before playing Part 2, refer students to Slide 2 and make sure they recognize what it depicts. Ask students what they expect to hear. Give them time to read questions 1–4. Tell them to write only brief notes. The main task is to absorb the meaning.
Play Part 2. Give them time to answer questions 1–4. Allow them to compare their answers. Feed back.
When they thoroughly understand the purpose and the methodology of the project, ask them what they expect to hear in the next part of the lecture (question 5). Elicit ideas but do not confirm or correct.
Answers Model answers:
1 Main idea = are women fully represented in senior positions across the university? Is this because of the institutional structure, or because of personality or unconscious attitudes?
2 The constructivist point of view is the theory that people’s behaviour is shaped by social interaction; therefore, institutional structures affect behaviour.
3 Stages of the project were: formulating research questions; collecting, organizing and interpreting
48
≤Exercise D 1 Play Part 3. Ask the first question and elicit ideas.
2 Set the second question for individual work and pairwork checking. Play Part 3 again. Tell students to take notes. Allow students to compare their definitions. Don’t, at this stage, confirm the answers.
data; and presenting results in terms of the university’s organizational structure.
4 Three: statistics from the university database; a psychometric test; structured interviews.
5 Answers depend on the students, but you would expect more details about the project.
Transcript ≤1.12 Part 2
The project I’ve been involved in over the last year started because there was a lot of concern that women were not fully represented in senior positions at our university. We wanted to find out if women were disadvantaged by organizational bias or affected by prejudice. We focused on women in this case, but our study could equally have looked at other social groups, such as the disabled or the over-50s. Our final aim was to see whether we needed to make institutional changes to improve women’s promotion opportunities.
We approached the study from a constructivist point of view which, as you probably already know, assumes that people’s behaviour is shaped by their social interaction. In other words, we were assuming from the beginning that the institutional structure would be largely responsible for the degree to which women occupied senior positions. However, we also wanted to take into account the effects of personality and look at staff attitudes towards success and women’s roles in the workplace.
The stages of the project included: formulating research questions, collecting, organizing and interpreting data, and presenting our results in terms of the university’s organizational structure.
Before I go on, I want to say a word about data collection. I’m sure you’ll have realized by now that we had to use more than one data-collection method. In fact, we used three. We collected statistics from the database, devised a psychometric test and drew up an interview schedule, which is a series of structured questions that act as a framework for an interview.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260 |
Page 261