search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
10 MODERN ADDICTIONS


Situation: description of a state of affairs, description often giving some reasons and background information


Description of research method 1: design description of the study: participants, data collection and analysis method, tasks, results


Description of research method 2: design description of the study: participants, data collection and analysis method, tasks, results


Evaluation of method(s): comparison of methods; limitations; opinion on advantages and disadvantages of the


methods + justification; an opinion on which is the best option + justification


Tell students they will plan (and possibly write) this essay. Answers


Model answers: 1 Description and evaluation. 2 Definition, analysis and evaluation.


3 Description, analysis, then comparison and evaluation/argument/opinion, plus support (see table above).


Exercise B


Set for individual work and pairwork checking. Feed back with the whole class.


Answers


Model answers: Situation


Research method 1


Two studies of body weight, diet and eating disorders.


Rizvi, Stice & Agras’ study: participants –


postpartum women; data collection method – self-reporting questionnaire + Eating Disorder Inventory, Body Mass index; results – (i) abnormal dieting patterns decreased over time, (ii) scores in body dissatisfaction increased


Research method 2


Heatherton, Mahamedi, Striepe and Keel’s


field study: participants – college students, age 20–22; data collection method – assessment and EDI; results – risk of eating disorder decreases with maturity


Comparison Rizvi study – self-reporting and of 1 & 2


questionnaire results conflicted; limitation – only one gender, only two data sources, recent childbirth affected results. Heatherton study – assessment g results clear; limitation – only two data sources


Exercise C


Set for individual work and pairwork checking. Feed back with the whole class.


Exercise E


1 Set for pairwork discussion. Students may want to follow up Keel’s article (source of Text A) for details about other research methods used in her study, as well as referring to the texts they have discussed in this lesson. Remind students about the basic structure of an essay (introduction – main body – conclusion).


If you wish, you can give students the first two columns of the table in the Answers section, with the third column empty for them to complete.


173


Questionnaires and assessments


comparison, argument and evaluation


Language note


The family name of the author referred to in this text is ‘Koran’. If you think there could be any confusion, you can explain to the class that this does not refer to the Islamic Holy Book. Ask students: How do Koran’s criteria for addiction match those described by Griffiths?


Answers


Model answers: Proposition


Supporting point 1


Supporting point 2


compulsive buying is a psychiatric disorder


compulsive buyers obsessed with urge to buy unnecessary items


compulsive buyers suffer distress and conflict with social responsibilities


Koran’s criteria match Griffiths’ criteria of: salience, tolerance and conflict with social functions.


Exercise D


Set for pairwork discussion. Feed back with the whole class. Accept any reasonable suggestions. Common- sense answers are also suitable here.


Answers Possible answers:


Data Collection Methods


Self-reporting Advantages


responses reflect individual perceptions


Disadvantages subjective


may be inconsistent may be inaccurate interpretation may be affected by researcher bias


easy to apply standardized questions objective


responses easy to convert to statistics


questions may not apply to individual participants


responses may not be accurate


interpretation of statistics may be affected by researcher bias


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261