search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUILDING DESIGN


This multidisciplinary collaborative effort will enable built environment and health professionals to work together to improve indoor quality environments.5 To mitigate airborne transmission risks it is necessary to supply effective ventilation with clean outdoor air and avoid recirculating air. The Brazilian standard for healthcare indoor air quality is from 2005 and is now under revision.6 The importance of indoor


environmental quality in healthcare buildings is highlighted worldwide. This movement can be understood as an evolutionary response to sick building syndrome (SBS), a term coined in the 1970s with the proliferation of fully sealed buildings with mechanical ventilation. In 1983, WHO used the term SBS for


the first time to describe situations in which building occupants experience acute health and comfort effects that appear to be linked to the time spent in a building, but no specific illness or cause can be identified. For so-called sick buildings, research has been done relating indoor air quality to diseases and infections.


Healthier buildings The green building movement that started during the 1990s focused much more on energy efficiency and reducing water consumption, culminating in building regulations like LEED,7 and EDGE.9


More, recently all green


buildings certifications are aiming to be ‘healthy’ buildings too. In the case of ‘healthy’ buildings, the


main target is people. What is evaluated is an integral view of indoor environmental quality and responses to human comfort and demands, are also behaviour-related to all users’ health. International Well Building Institute


certification has a specific chapter on perception and human mind, which includes actions at the interface between users and the built environment.10


Building


certification intention has changed to promoting people’s health, covering physical, mental and social health, like the current WHO definition of complete health. Therefore, not only building concepts but also professionals’ mindsets need to be revised based on the updated scientific evidence. The ‘Well Building Standard’ highlights aspects such as the relationship between the various contaminants present in


Figure 2. Brazil map: mortality rate per region. BREEAM8


indoor air and how much they can trigger an allergy or asthma, or do any harm. The concepts evaluated in Well certification include not only air quality, lighting, sound, human comfort, but also water, materials and energy, all focused on users’ health. Some innovative aspects evaluated are nutrition, physical exercises and mental wellbeing. Likewise, lighting in a Well-certified building must be assessed not only by amount of lighting (luminance) and visual requirements appropriate to each function, but also the effects of the built environment on users´ circadian cycle. The circadian cycle is the natural biological regulation between day and night made by the human body through the production of hormones cortisol and melatonin. Cortisol hormone keeps people awake and is also related to stress. This can be mitigated by melanopic lighting, and evaluating photometry rates and melanopic lux.11


Indoor pollutants Care teams that work in ICUs on night shifts have their circadian cycle altered and may become more stressed. This may be one of the reasons why the Brazilian Nursing Council does not allow 24-hour shifts while, on the other hand, the Brazilian Medical Council still allows it.12,13 There are also other building


certifications that assess people and their relationships with built environments. The ‘For Health - Healthy Building Certificate’ follows global movement of healthy buildings and had professionals trained in USA working in Brazil since 2019. The


The concepts evaluated in Well certification include not only air quality, lighting, sound, human comfort, but also water, materials and energy, focusing on user’s health


58


Healthy Building Certificate was developed by Harvard University, in Boston, USA, and is being implemented in healthy buildings in several countries.14 Joseph Allen, director of Harvard’s


Healthy Buildings Program, wrote how some called ‘persistent damaging chemicals’ at indoor polluted air can harm human health and can impact other cognitive functions.15 For example, the paints and sealants


contain volatile organic compounds (VOC) that can cause headaches, red eyes and throat irritation. Maintaining a healthcare environment, requires walls to be painted during its operation, which is a big challenge even with the use of water- based paints that have less odour and do not harm people so much.


Human comfort The importance of indoor built environments quality is confirmed by the growing interest in human comfort in recent decades. Fabio Bitencourt dedicated a chapter to the topic ‘Comfort: perceptions and sensations’ in a Brazilian Health Surveillance publication.16 The author explains the importance of sustainability, hygrothermal comfort, acoustic comfort, visual comfort, ergonomic comfort in the human rhythm, and circadian cycle in minimising risks, errors and accidents to people in hospitals, all integrated in healthcare building design and construction.17 Regardless of whether the hospital


get an environmental certification or not, all hospitals need to take care of users’ health, so they should control indoor environment aspects and air quality to be healthy hospitals. Water and energy consumption have already been tabled by the Brazilian National Association of Private Hospitals (ANAHP). ANAHP represents 122 big complex associated hospitals, which corresponded to 28,288 beds and 6,665 ICU beds at the end of 2019.18


IFHE DIGEST 2021


Source: Brazilian States Health Secretariats, Brazil, 2020.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116