sure that the message is being heard and understood.” The ERA has gained momentum
in the wake of the #MeToo movement protesting sexual harassment and sexual assault and the recent wave of women being elected to political office. However, advocates in Virginia were pushing for the amendment well before that. The amendment has been passed five times in the state Senate since 2011, most recently in 2016. “I am certain that the current cultural
context is playing some sort of role but here in Virginia, there have always been women working on this ratification,” says Hornung. But the ERA isn’t being supported
only by women. State Sen. Glen Sturtevant (R-Richmond) is introducing a similar resolution in the Senate. During the past two years state Sen.
Scott Surovell, a Democrat from Mount Vernon, sponsored ERA legislation. Sturtevant says prohibiting gender
discrimination in state and federal laws isn’t enough. The constitutional amend- ment would ensure equality for all Ameri- cans, he says. “I’m hopeful that folks will continue
to evolve on this issue and recognize that this really is a fundamentally American principle,” he says. Foy and Sturtevant participated in
VA ratify ERA’s 10-day November bus tour, which sought to drum up support for the initiative. The purple bus — splashed with the message “Honk if you [heart] equality!” — made 38 stops throughout Virginia. The VA ratify ERA campaign had
collected roughly 5,600 signatures as of early December for a petition supporting the amendment. The goal is to gather 20,000 signatures before the General Assembly session begins Jan. 9. A recently released poll suggests
the campaign is working. The survey by the Judy Ford Wason Center for Public Policy at Christopher Newport University found 81 percent of the respondents favor ratification. Gov. Ralph Northam also wants to
see the amendment passed. “The word on the street, as we say, is that there’s support from both sides of the aisle,” Northam says.
Photo courtesy VA ratify ERA
The VA ratify ERA campaign embarked on a 10-day bus tour in November to drum up support for the initiative.
Pros and cons on ERA The question is whether there’s
enough support. Since 2011, the full House has never voted on the ERA. The Senate has passed resolutions since then, but the measure didn’t make it out of committee last year. Del. Mark Cole (R-Spotsylvania
County) didn’t support hearing the resolu- tion in a House committee last year because of the amendment’s lapsed deadlines. The original deadline for 38 states to ratify the amendment was 1979. When that timeline wasn’t met, the deadline was extended until 1982. Five states also have rescinded their ratifications. Cole says that means there’s not enough support for the amendment. “Some ERA proponents want to
ignore facts they do not like, such as the ratification deadline and that five states withdrew their ratification,” Cole said in a statement to Virginia Business. Cole says he supports equal rights but believes Con- gress must resubmit the ERA to the states for ratification before it can be considered by the Virginia legislature. “ERA proponents should spend their
time lobbying Congress and not trying to get the General Assembly to pass a resolution that would have no effect or, worse, spark a series of costly and divisive lawsuits,” he says. Advocates, however, say the expired
deadlines are irrelevant because they weren’t included in the amendment. Many supporters also cite the passage amendment, which regulates
of the 27th the pay of congressmen. That change was
www.VirginiaBusiness.com
ratified in 1992, more than 202 years after it was proposed. Proponents also say that Article V,
which sets the process for changing the Constitution, does not require a deadline and note that a fully ratified amend- ment has never been kept out of the Constitution.
The impact Another question that has no clear
answer is: What effect will the amend- ment have if it finally is adopted? Opponents fear it could have negative
repercussions. They argue females could be drafted into the military or lose certain contracts awarded to women-owned businesses. Saikrishna Prakash, a University of
Virginia law professor, says the amend- ment could affect any policy favoring one sex over the other. Currently, it’s legally easier to justify affirmative action based on gender than race, he notes. More women than men today are
attending college. The situation could become problematic, Prakash says, if col- leges decided to admit more men. “It’s symbolic for people,” Prakash
says about the push for the amendment. “They want to know the governments can’t draw these distinctions, but no one can say with certainty what this language will mean for concrete cases until the courts decide those cases.” Only time will tell whether Virginia
will lead the change and what it will all mean.
VIRGINIA BUSINESS | 33
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80
