search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
■ Business Trends: TOP HOSPITALS


Mixed results V


irginia hospitals saw mixed results in the most recent nation- wide patient satisfaction survey. The number of hospitals getting


high scores on the survey is rising, but the overall average for more than 80 facilities remains unchanged. Those are some of the trends found


in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems from the federal Centers for Medicare & Med- icaid Services. The Virginia results were provided by Virginia Health Information, a Richmond-based nonprofit, which also recently released “service line” information showing the volume of patients dis- charged by hospitals in 2015 for various treatments. The patient satisfaction survey, con-


ducted from January through December 2015, asks patients to rate their hospital experiences. First, they are asked to grade hospitals on a 10-point scale, with “9 or 10” being the highest score. Then patients were asked whether they would recommend hospitals to friends and family. The most positive response was “Yes, Definitely.” At least 80 percent of patients gave


six Virginia hospitals high praise on both questions in 2015. By comparison, only three hospitals had met that mark in 2014. Statewide, however, the average per-


centage of patients giving hospitals high scores on both questions was 70 percent. While that figure has improved from 64 percent since 2009, the 2015 percentage remained unchanged from 2014. Nationally, the 2015 patient satis-


faction average was 72 percent, up one percentage point from 2014. Virginia’s satisfaction rate has trailed the national rate every year since 2009.


Photo by Chris Cunningham, courtesy Gresham, Smith and Partners The Virginia hospitals getting high


satisfaction ratings on both survey ques- tions from 80 percent or more of their patients in 2015 were: Virginia Hospital Center in Arlington, Sentara Princess Anne Hospital in Virginia Beach, Sentara Leigh Hospital in Norfolk, Haymarket Medical Center in Prince William County, Sentara Williamsburg Regional Medical Center and Riverside Doctors’ Hospital Williamsburg. Four other hospitals had high satis-


faction ratings from 80 percent or more of their patients on one of the survey questions. They were Carilion Giles Com- munity Hospital in Pearisburg, Sentara Martha Jefferson Hospital in Charlot- tesville and Inova Fair Oaks and Inova Fairfax hospitals in Northern Virginia. The satisfaction rates for all Virginia acute-care hospitals are listed on the fol-


www.VirginiaBusiness.com


lowing pages. This section also includes the latest


service line information from VHI. The data offer a snapshot of the market share that hospitals hold for various treatments in their regions. Inova Fairfax Hospital, for example,


accounted for more than 50 percent of the oncology patients discharged in Northern Virginia in 2015. On the other hand, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital and Sentara Princess Anne Hospital were virtually tied in the percentage of Hampton Roads obstetrics/delivery patients they served, 14.5 percent vs. 14.4 percent. More service line charts are available


at VHI’s website, www.vhi.org. The web- site also provides additional information on hospitals, physicians, health insurance, HMOs and nursing facilities.


VIRGINIA BUSINESS 41


More hospitals get high marks, but the average patient satisfaction score is unchanged by Robert Powell


Haymarket Medical Center is one of six Virginia hospitals that received high scores on the latest Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems report.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80