search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Cover Story


Brendan Dwyer at VCU’s Center for Sport Leadership says some politicians see sports betting “as an opportunity to raise revenue without upsetting taxpayers.”


Dwyer, the director of research and distance learning at Virginia Commonwealth University’s Cen- ter for Sport Leadership. “I think that perception is changing, and I think politicians are seeing it as an opportunity to raise revenue without upsetting taxpayers.”


States cash in In May, the Supreme Court


struck down the 1992 Profes- sional and Amateur Sports Pro- tection Act. The law prohibited states from allowing betting on sports, restricting single-game wagering to Nevada. (Before the decision, Delaware, Montana and Oregon were also exempt and offered limited, pool wagering. Oregon ended sports betting in 2007 when it was courting NCAA championship games.) Anticipating the Supreme


reduce the influence of moral conservatives who say the state should have little to do with authorized gambling.” Now, the commonwealth is


presented with another possible choice — thanks to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that will dramatically expand legalized bet-


The early movers


Since the Supreme Court’s ruling, several states are offering – or soon will offer – sports wagering. Most states plan to impose taxes based on gross gaming revenue. Last year, Nevada’s sports gambling revenue was about $249 million. GamblingCompliance expects the sports betting market in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania to exceed Nevada’s revenues.


State Delaware


Betting locations Casinos


Mississippi Casinos Casinos


Effective state tax rate* (GGR) 50 percent ** 11-12


New Jersey Casinos, racetracks, online 9.75 (land based); 14.25 (online) New York


10


Pennsylvania Casinos, off-track betting centers, online


Rhode Island Casinos West Virginia Casinos, online


*Excludes federal excise tax of 0.25 percent of betting handle. ** Reflects states’ share of net wagering revenue.


36


51 ** 10


NOTE: GGR = Gross gaming revenue Source: GamblingCompliance


ting on all types of sports. Observers say sports betting


has the potential to be a revenue generator for the state. “There’s just a cultural


perception change on the per- ceived benefits and the perceived detriments of sports betting and betting in general,” says Brendan


Court’s decision, several states already had passed legislation pav- ing the way for sports betting. By June, casino visitors in


New Jersey and Delaware were placing bets on a host of sporting events, including the World Cup soccer championships and Major League Baseball games. Soon, gamblers in Pennsylvania, Mis- sissippi, West Virginia, Rhode Island and New York should be able to make similar bets. The sports betting industry


could be huge. U.S. sports wager- ing likely will produce $3.1 billion to $5.2 billion in annual revenue by 2023, predicts GamblingCom- pliance, a company that follows the global gambling industry. The demand certainly is


there. “There’s plenty of research to suggest that [sports betting is already] happening whether it’s illegal gambling or offshore gam- bling,” says Dwyer. Legalization would just drive more interest, he says.


GamblingCompliance


predicts that 25 to 37 states will approve sports wagering within five years. Because of its past reluctance to expand gambling,


26 AUGUST 2018 Photo courtesy VCU


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104