This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The largest range of validated ChIP antibodies

The largest range of validated ChIP antibodies

“Hardcore RNA chemist” Saba Valadkhan in the lab. Countering resistance

To get a sense of the dif ficulties researchers face in Noncodarnia, look no further than Case Western University biochemist Saba Valadkhan. When Valadkhan started her lncRNA

project in 2006, there were no deep sequencing or large-scale transcriptomic data available. “We had to rely on a very small number of accidentally discovered long noncoding RNAs to choose one for our studies.” Not wanting to step on anybody’s

toes, Valadkhan searched the liter- ature for interesting but “abandoned” lncRNAs. She settled on a bone morpho- genic protein-induced transcript first described in 1998. But working with that transcript,

Supported by comprehensive experimental data:

Supported by comprehensive experimental data:

• Over 1,000 images • More than 1,900 user reviews • Cited in over 3,750 publications

• Over 1,000 images • More than 1,900 user reviews • Cited in over 3,750 publications

Discover more at Discover more at

she says, has been a challenge. “We really didn’t even know what to worry about and what would be okay.” For instance, when cloning the transcript, what would happen if extra sequences were tacked onto the 5´ or 3´ ends? “They can potentially change the secondary structure of the RNA in these regions ... or they can be binding sites for proteins that shouldn’t be bound to this RNA.” Knockdowns weren’t obvious, either. Where, for instance, should she target the interfering RNAs? Function was a problem, as was the

dearth of knowledgeable colleagues. And so, when the data started rolling in, Valadkhan’s team wasn’t sure how to deal with it. They didn’t know, for instance, how much of a phenotypic response was real as opposed to noise.


The only thing they knew for sure was that their RNA seemed to be doing something amazing. When overexpressed in myoblasts,

the transcript caused the cells to “change shape strongly and [start] to grow little processes.” The team had no idea what that meant, but the postdoc doing this work thought the cells kind of looked like neurons. “Lo and behold they were screaming with neuronal marker expression,” Valadkhan says. This was in 2007, she says, shortly

after Shinya Yamanaka introduced the world to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nobody doubts the power of transcription factors to alter cell fate, yet Valadkhan’s discovery that noncoding RNAs evidently do the same, remains unpublished. “The reviewers hated it,” she says.

“They said this must be an artifact.” Reviewers asked for control after

control. They demanded knockout mice. They even questioned Valadkhan, whose background is in “hardcore RNA chemistry,” on her ability to culture cells. Six years later the paper is once again

under review. “Again they have asked for quite a number of things,” she says, “but at least the tone of the reviewers has become more and more positive with every submission. I think it’s partly because we are adding a lot more controls and data,” she allows. “But partly also because people are appreciating that these RNAs can really do these kinds of things.” For too long, Mattick says, the broad

molecular biology community has acted as if it had the conceptual framework of cellular genetic regulation more or less figured out, thanks to promoters, enhancers, and transcription factors. “They decided they understood the system 50 years ago, after just a decade or so of initial work, and haven’t really changed their minds since.” That view seems final ly to be

changing, Mattick says. It looks to be a fine day in Noncodarnia.

1. A. Maxmen, “Te genome’s rising stars,” Nature, 496:127−9, 2013.

2. J.S. Mattick, “Non-coding RNAs: the architects of eukaryotic complexity,” EMBO Reports, 2:986−91, 2001.

3. J.T.Y. Kung et al., “Long noncoding RNAs: Past, present, and future,” Genetics, 193:651−669, 2013.

Written by Jeffrey M. Perkel, Ph.D.

BioTechniques 54:301-304 (June 2013) doi: 10.2144/000114037


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68