This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Features BioSpotlight Gene capture touches down

Next-generation sequencing has been a major boon for evolu- tionary biologists interested in comparing the genomes of di- vergent species. In most cases, however, de novo whole genome sequencing of a previously uncharacterized species is impracti- cal and oſten unnecessary given the time, labor, and cost. A far more efficient approach to exploring evolutionary relationships would be to sequence small groups of homologous genes using DNA hybridization capture technology (i.e. gene capture us- ing bait sequences) or PCR. Gene capture is superior to PCR amplification for large-scale targeting of specific genes but tends to work best with closely related species or when baits are designed against highly conserved gene sequences within otherwise divergent genomes. Isolating genes whose sequenc- es diverge significantly from the bait sequences has not been accomplished using current gene capture protocols. In this month’s issue, Gavin Naylor and colleagues at the College of Charleston, (Charleston, SC) describe their new gene capture methodology that can isolate a predetermined set of protein- coding genes from species that have diverged by up to several hundred million years. Te team first optimized the relaxed stringencies for the hybridization and washing steps from a previous touchdown hybridization gene capture scheme.

Going digital

Since the concept of limiting dilution PCR was first introduced in BioTechniques in 1992, subsequent advances in methodol- ogy as well as microfluidic and array-based technologies have led to the digital PCR (dPCR) approaches available today. By partitioning samples into thousands of subreactions containing a single transcript each on a nanofluidic array, dPCR allows for binary reading of the results. A simple present or absent call for each subreac- tion allows near absolute quantification of DNA copy numbers, making dPCR espe- cially attractive for transcript analysis in single cells where limited RNA content is a concern. Functional studies of single neu- rons have been conducted for years, relying on patch clamping techniques to record electrophysiological responses to particular stimuli. To detect gene expression changes accompanying those responses, researchers oſten harvest the cellular contents into the patch pipette. Subsequent RNA amplifica- tion allows for analysis of gene expression patterns, providing insight into the rela- tionship between molecular and function- al changes. In these experiments, transcript abundance is usually measured by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), despite concerns about the sensitivity of this tech-

Vol. 54 | No. 6 | 2013

Baits targeting single-copy protein-coding genes shared across six different gnathosome vertebrate species (human, western clawed toad, green anole, zebrafish, and elephant shark) were designed with up to 39% dissimilarity and separately con- structed in custom biotinylated RNA bait libraries. Baits from each species were then used to capture selected target genes from distantly related species within the same class, which were then sequenced. When using standard hybridization and washing conditions, very few target sequences were obtained, whereas Naylor and colleagues’ touchdown scheme resulted in an eight-fold increase in captured sequences. Carrying out two rounds of capture further increased the number of targets ob- tained. Tis method also proved quite effective when applied to a diverse group of 13 chondrichthyan fishes, demonstrating that the technique was more consistent when used on a sample of more closely related taxonomic lineages. With this opti- mized gene capture protocol, researchers will be able to more effectively compare homologous genes across highly divergent taxa, further enhancing molecular phylogenetic studies.

See “Capturing protein genes across highly divergent species” on page 321.

Application of spike-in template in dPCR analysis. Synthetic rps18 template (s_rps18) with subsequent dilution (0–81 copies per reaction)

nique. Although access to dPCR technol- ogy is increasing, it has not yet been applied to these single neuron studies. Now, in this issue of BioTechniques, Farago et al. pres- ent a combined digital PCR–patch clamp electrophysiology method for


mRNA and miRNA expression in single neurons. Te accuracy and sensitivity of this approach was validated using spike-in templates of known concentration. Precise copy number counts were obtained for transcripts of interest, even when expres- sion levels were very low. Although dPCR technology remains expensive, coupling it with patch clamp extraction of cellular contents enables the collection of accurate


and sensitive gene expression data for phys- iologically well-defined single neurons. Te combination of dPCR and patch clamp promises improved accuracy for transcript analysis and will provide another option for researchers working with single cells.

See “Digital PCR to determine the number of transcripts from single neurons aſter patch-clamp recording” on page 327.

Selected and written by Patrick C. H. Lo, Ph.D. and Kristie Nybo, Ph.D.

BioTechniques 54:295 (June 2013) doi 10.2144/000114034

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68