This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
NEW ZEALAND


of asset sales. After driving the government books deeper into deficit with irresponsible top- end tax cuts and poor-quality spending, [Prime Minister] John Key now tells us that we have to sell our assets to cover the fiscal hole that he created. In fact, asset sales make the government deficit worse and the national accounts worse. “The casino owners, the


miners, the property speculators, the oil companies, those who pollute waterways or our atmosphere—they are all doing really well under John Key’s watch, but National has turned its back on the belief that we are all in this together”.


of any chance of ever leading this country to any sort of economic better position”. However, Hon. David Parker,


THIRD READING: NEW ZEALAND


Hon. David Parker, MP Hon. Gerry Brownlee, MP Hon. Gerry Brownlee,


MP, Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery, expressed surprise about “the apparent lack of worry from other side of the House about New Zealand’s financial situation, and absolutely no recognition that there is throughout the world a crisis going on. New Zealand’s economy is one per cent of the world’s economy. We are like a little leaf on a large, tumultuous ocean that is being battered by a hurricane. “We are keeping our head up


as a nation—no question about that—in quite a remarkable way. But for there to be a denial that the turmoil in the rest of the world’s economic activity is somehow not going to affect New Zealand is, I think, an abdication


MP, (Labour) responded that “John Key and the National Party always blame Christchurch or Greece for New Zealand’s problems. Greece and Europe have problems. Outside of Greece and Europe, average growth in the world has been 1.5 per cent per annum since National has been in government. Over that same period New Zealand has grown under one per cent—not one per cent per annum, but one percent in three years.”


Hon. Clayton Cosgrove,


MP, (Labour) said “If you are in business you would label


Fair Trading (Soliciting on Behalf of Charities) Amendment Bill The Fair Trading (Soliciting on Behalf of Charities) Amendment Bill, a Member’s Bill in the name of Mr Michael Woodhouse (National)—originally introduced by Hon. Amy Adams, MP, (National)— had its third reading on 27 June 2012, and was passed with unanimous support. Mr Woodhouse explained


that the Bill would “provide increased transparency and public accountability for professional third-party collectors who are in the business of collecting funds on behalf of registered charities”. He acknowledged the costs of raising funds, but noted: “a trend has emerged where fund-raising organizations are used by charities to assist with the collection process.” For that reason “those donating money do have a right to be given accurate information about the proportion of those funds that are retained by those groups”. Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga (National)


said: “There is concern that a disproportionate percentage of donated money is retained by third- party collectors to cover their costs, and that the members of the public making those donations are not quite aware of this. “The concern has actually led to


Hon. Clayton Cosgrove, MP


[government Members] as nuts. … They have a plan that flicks a few dollars—a lot of dollars—off the old folks, a few dollars off the youngest and most vulnerable, and flogs off our assets


members of the public not donating, because of grave concern that their moneys are not going to the causes for which they are intended. “Media reports have shown


that it is not uncommon for some collections to actually retain up to 90 per cent of moneys donated by the public.”


Hon. David Cunliffe, MP,


(Labour), saying that the Bill “addresses an area of concern for the public, and that is why we are supporting it”. He explained that “the Bill was rewritten in the Commerce Committee to enable regulations to be made relating to disclosure by fundraisers making requests for charitable purposes. Currently there are no rules on what has to be disclosed, except that no misleading or deceptive statements may be made”. Mr David Clendon (Labour)


called the regulatory approach involving ministerial discretion “the best available outcome”, and Mr Denis O’Rourke (New Zealand First) described the areas of regulation in the Bill: “Those include regulations


for prescribing requirements for disclosure of information about the fundraiser, about the charitable organization itself, and about the relationship between those two parties, which can be very different in nature. “Also included are the financial


benefits the fundraiser would receive, directly or indirectly, from the process, the amount of the donation included in the price of goods and also how the disclosure will take place, and how the financial benefit must be calculated and expressed. Finally included is the financial benefit that the fundraiser would not be required to disclose.” Dr Jian Yang (National) stated


his belief that the Bill “will help restore faith in charities, which rely heavily on the kind generosity of New Zealanders, and ensure that their good work continues and that consumer rights are fully protected”.


The Parliamentarian | 2012: Issue Three | 219


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84