Display technology Whether it’s VR or AR, the displays will have to get better, according to McEldowney. ‘As an optical designer, the display I want really isn’t available,’ he said. McEldowney would like to see a display

that’s 30-40mm in the diagonal and has pixel densities closer to that of microdisplays rather than those used for mobile phones. Microdisplays are too small, he said, adding he would ideally like a larger, consumer-cost version of a microdisplay. Along with optical design and new

displays, clever techniques like foveated rendering – only rendering the portion of the screen the eye is focused on, rather than all the pixels – will come into play to make VR more realistic. Foveated rendering, however, needs eye tracking technology. Black said foveated rendering is a good

example of using existing computer power to improve the user experience. Eye tracking is also going to be the key,

a problem not only to do with display technology, but also with the optical system. ‘It’s about the pixel density you can see in

your eye,’ McEldowney explained. ‘We have to think about pixels per degree.’ The current VR systems have around a 90-degree field of view, which gives about 15 pixels per degree. The human visual system, according to McEldowney, can see 120 pixels per degree. ‘If we just want to solve this with pixels,

we’re going to have to get 10 times better than we are today, and that’s not going to happen any time soon,’ he said. Pixels per degree is a function of field of

view and pixel density. With more pixels, will it be beneficial to increase the resolution or widen the field of view? That’s a key question, McEldowney said, adding that it will probably be a combination of both. However, he said that, from an optical standpoint, getting beyond a 90-degree field of view in such a small form factor is not a trivial thing. ‘I’m pretty convinced that there are emerging design forms [of optics] that will allow us to get 100-degree fields of view,’ he commented. During the panel discussion, McEldowney

listed some of the criteria VR system designers would ideally want from the optics. The first would be a wider field of view: we can see 220 degrees, while VR headsets today are at around 90 degrees. Secondly, to reach higher resolutions, the optics have to have high modulation transfer function (MTF) at those resolutions which, | @electrooptics

in addition to the wide field of view, is going to be ‘extremely challenging’, McEldowney remarked. Current VR systems are only 8-bit, but

a human eye can see 20 bits. Stray light artefacts will also have to be considered. In addition, these systems currently use fixed lenses, but the human eyes are dynamic focusing elements – ‘clearly you would want to have something like that,’ McEldowney said.

The final point McEldowney made was concerning ergonomics and being able wear these devices for hours at a time. McEldowney added that VR companies will ultimately have to build prototypes to find out what optical design gives the best user experience.

The optics used in VR are not simple – it might just be one lens, but McEldowney described the optics as being a ‘unique compromise between a lot of different factors’ – but one of the ways to get the cost of the system down is to use inexpensive optics. Frank Black, director of B2B sales at

McEldowney added, for implementing dynamic focus lenses similar to those found in the eye. Dynamic focus would improve comfort and experience, but as to what sort of technology will be used is still an open question – will it be holographic, a multi- planar system, or a variable focus system? McEldowney asked. VR had a strong presence at Photonics

“With more pixels, will it be beneficial to increase the resolution, or widen the field of view?”

HTC Vive, commented during the panel discussion that four years ago a typical VR system with a Zeiss lens was $40,000. Current systems are priced at around $700, and this has been achieved through reducing the cost of the lenses and employing shader technology to optimise the graphic pipeline, Black said.

West, often as a marketing tool to give trade fair visitors a virtual tour of a company’s products, but there were also enabling technologies on display. One of the finalists of the Startup Challenge, where early stage entrepreneurs pitch their business to a team of judges, was TriLite Technologies, which had developed a laser light module for AR and VR applications. To a certain extent, the content creation for VR will depend on the hardware available, but McEldowney observed that to get a good user experience, it’s not just the optics that need to be taken into account, but the display, tracking system, graphics pipeline, and calibration. ‘When you think about the optics for the lenses, you really

can’t just think about them as a lens issue, you have to think about it as a system issue,’ McEldowney said. ‘The only way to know if you are making

the experience better is to build a system and actually experience it,’ he said, adding that getting from emerging technologies to prototypes and building systems as quickly as possible is key to the adoption of many of these new technologies. EO

March 2017 Electro Optics 13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44