This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
WASHROOM HYGIENE Chop The Mop


If you really care about washroom hygiene, then you’ve got to ‘chop the mop,’ according to James White, Managing Director of Denis Rawlins Limited, as he calls for a shift to science-based cleaning.


Growing awareness of the need for high standards of hygiene and preventing cross-contamination, particularly around areas where food is prepared, is to be welcomed. But in our industry – and sectors from hospitality to schools – there’s an elephant in the room, or rather the washroom.


If we’re serious about tackling pathogens and toxins lurking in buildings, then we need to recognise that washrooms, rest rooms, toilets – call them what you will – are the seat of the problem.


Their high frequency of use, common touch points for transferring microbes, and user exposure to bio-hazardous wastes combine to make washrooms a special case for treatment. When people are ill, they tend to use washrooms more, and are thus more likely to transmit infection there.


Washrooms present another problem, apart from the usual drips, splashes, fl ush air plume and dampness (making for an unhealthy breeding ground for germs and odour-causing bacteria). Flooded toilets mix the bacteria normally found in the human gut with organisms already on the fl oor from people’s shoes. These contaminated liquids can soak into porous fl oors and grout lines, creating a real health hazard, not to mention a foul-smelling environment.


All too often the evidence is there for our eyes or nose, but even when a washroom looks and smells clean, it may be hosting colonies of harmful bacteria – and cleaners and facility managers will have no idea.


It’d be wrong to blame cleaning budget cuts or corner-cutting operatives (though we can understand why they might turn their nose up at kneeling down to wipe behind toilet bowls). The real culprit is the mop.


64


According to the best estimates we can fi nd, up to 70% of all fl oor surfaces are still ‘cleaned’ with a mop and bucket. Yet mops are far more effective at spreading soils and contaminants than removing them. Much of what they do lift off the fl oor is likely to end up back there as the mop head is doused in the bucket’s dirty water, which is true even for microfi bre mop-heads.


Mopping is also painfully slow, and it can’t tackle other surfaces, so cleaning a washroom is often as unproductive as it is ineffective. Hence our campaign to ‘Chop the mop!’


It doesn’t take a scientist to tell us that mopping fails to de-contaminate


fl oors and is outdated. But the other plank of our campaign is a plea for science-based cleaning, so that we can have confi dence in the cleaning solutions we choose.


Although we are a cleaning equipment supplier, we act as consultants to contractors and clients. Our primary commitment is not to a particular manufacturer’s line of equipment – but to recommending the right process and machine for the job. We also fi rmly believe that cleaning, and the people who do the work, should be seen as professional. Mop in hand, they can’t be.


A system that sprays a cleaning solution, rinses with clean water under high pressure, and removes dirt and contaminants by vacuuming has to be more effective and hygienic. And the science proves it.


Studies in the US have shown that the Kaivac No-Touch Cleaning system is up to 60 times more effective at removing bacterial contamination than mops. And it’s more productive, taking between a half and a third of the time.


Another advantage is that all washroom surfaces (and touch points), from urinals, basins and taps to handles and push plates, can be cleaned hygienically in the same way. Bacteria can be removed even from grout lines, crevices and corners that are hard if not impossible to clean with traditional methods.


This labour-saving approach is more cost-effective for the client, more dignifi ed for staff, and healthier for washroom users. This is why we’re convinced that cleaning today should be science-based, hygienic ‘No- Touch’ cleaning.


www.rawlins.co.uk/kaivactc


www.tomorrowscleaning.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94