FOCUS ON Community: L.A.

Lions and tigers and bears... oh my!


City of L.A. sought input from its equine advisory council when L.A. Zoo planned expansion near Griffith Park trails. special to the horsetrader

OS ANGELES—When the Los Angeles Recreation and Parks Department recently wanted a horse person’s per-

spective on a Los Angeles Zoo expansion plan in Griffith Park, it turned to a familiar voice—Lynn Brown. Brown’s resume reads like a Who’s Who

in equestrian advocacy, having served as National Trail Coordinator for Equestrian Trails, Inc. for 20 years and more recently as a 10-year Vice President of the L.A. Equine Advisory Commitee. If you aren’t familiar with the LAEAC but you are a civic-minded equestrian, you might become familiar with it. It’s a model for effective representation in City Hall for horsepeople, created by L.A. City Council in 2009. It was a historic first, as equestrians had never had an official voice to the city. Each city councilperson appoints one member to sit on the LAEAC,

Environmental Management Group. The Zoo’s NOP was the first step in a thorough environmental impact report. “It is a professional project, with strict guidelines to the process, and the NOP com- mitee were friendly and took notes about what I presented,” said Brown, who spoke for two hours on behalf of the LAEAC with some remarkable numbers: an estimated 50,000 annual visits to the Griffith Park trails by hikers and a minimum of 6,000 horses. In the heart of Los Angeles, the 4,310-acre

Griffith Park sits at the eastern end of the Santa Monica Mountains, the largest urban park in North America with about 54 miles of equestrian and hiking trails. “You can ride all day without duplicating

available trails,” Brown said. These trails, though, were not all clearly

marked on maps used in the NOP process. The maps also did not show current rec- reational facilities outside the Zoo’s footprint. This alarmed Brown. So did the engineers’ unfamiliarity with horses. “People who interviewed me

About 6,000 horses each year ride the 54 miles of trails at Griffith Park.

which reports directly back to council on the issues. The zoo’s expansion is in an early stage,

the perfect time for the Rec and Parks Department to call in Brown to represent equestrian trail concerns over the L.A. Zoo’s development plans. The interview was part of the project’s “Notice of Preparation” (NOP) with the Bureau of Engineering,

had no knowledge of trails, trail access or how horses react to fright—and especially to pred- ators nearby,” said Brown. “The engineers seemed surprised at this. They had no idea that as a prey animal, horses are hard-wired in their brains and instincts to escape a predator any means possible—spinning and bolting at top speed to get away quickly, bucking. rearing, generally with no regard to their human riders. “

When she explained this to the Zoo and

the engineers, they all nodded as if they understood. “My information was that the lions, tigers, elephants and bears would not be moved out of the Zoo habitat canyon where their pres- ence does not disturb the equestrian trail users,” she said. “Currently, there is no prob- lem with large predators—by sight, smell or

Planners of a zoo expansion next to popular trails in Griffith Park were receptive of recent equestrian input.

noise There can be nervous atention with some horses as the monkeys start hooting about 10 a.m., but that isn’t usually danger- ous for riders.” There were concerns, though, for the long-established, well-used equestrian trails bordering the Zoo. Since some of these trails also directly abut the Zoo property line, any new construction with heavy machinery would make the trail hazardous and unsafe, she said. Other concerns about construction impact (water run-off, erosion, effects on native plants and wildlife), surfaced, as well as concerns from increased vehicular traf- fic—especially at horse crossings. Brown was surprised near the end of her

interview when she learned the Zoo planned to develop facilities next to heavily-used trails and have lions and tigers close in the area. “I objected to placing predators near horse

trails,” she said. “ Their answer was that they could build a wall. I responded that a wall won’t work, as horses can still smell the lions and tigers—and hear them roar, which would cause dangerous run-aways, geting people and horses hurt or even killed.” Brown said such development would make

popular equestrian trails unusable to the equestrian public, and it could also have neg- ative effects on the neighboring trails. Entire sections of the now popular, safe park would be abandoned by the public, she said. The Zoo planning process is under way

now, and reportedly will continue for 20 years. This fall, announcements for public meetings and comments on the Zoo Vision Plan will be held.

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80