This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ITS ARCHITECTURE FRAME Rule your traffic kingdom.


With IRD’s ITS Solutions


HTMS/Traffic Safety Systems


Commercial Vehicle Enforcement/Operations


is very important when the component C is excluded is that the interfaces remain so it is easy to make system upgrades (defined interfaces and component description exists).


Risk analysis According to the PMBOK 12


Traffic Data Collection Systems


Highway Toll Collection Systems


plan, the risk management


process is organised around five consecutive phases: a) Identify hazards – this process is used to identify and gather all the hazards, and their nature, which could impact the project. SWOT analysis is a part of this process.


b)Perform a qualitative risk analysis – this process is per- formed quickly to determine as soon as possible which hazards have the highest priorities on the project. It uses the probability and impact matrix (PIM) to prioritise and rank the risks.


Border and Security Systems


Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Scales & Sensors


c)Perform quantitative risk analysis – assigns a projected value (usually this value is stated in terms of cost or time) to the hazards that have already being ranked by the previ- ous process.


d)Plan risk responses – this process plans for how each risk will be managed, and who will be responsible for them.


e)Monitor and control risks – is the process of implement- ing risk responses plans, tracking identified risks, identify- ing new hazards, and evaluating risk process effectiveness throughout the project.


Fleet Telematics Service and Maintenance


Planned risk management should take place early in the project because it will have a significant impact on all aspects such as scope, time, cost, quality, and procurement. The component specifications and communications


INTERNATIONAL ROAD DYNAMICS INC. www.irdinc.com | info@irdinc.com


62 IRD_Crown_halfvert_ThinkingHighways_1303.indd 1


requirements produced from the physical viewpoint for the system created from the FRAME Architecture and with the addition of the results from the analysis of organisational issues and cost benefit referred to earlier, are all used to define the hazards in a) above. It is also possible to use the


thinkinghighways.com 3/15/2013 5:47:38 PM Vol 8 No 3 Europe/Rest of the World


Figure 3: Component based C/B analysis


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92