This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Dependencies


FOCUS ON Crown


“In a player protection trust a third party controls the funds representing the player deposits”


service standards. A player protection trust would usually hold at least 101 per cent of the gaming company’s player liability, although it can hold an amount equal to the liability. The latter could lead to potential shortfalls from a timing perspective. A major benefit of using a trust is that it does not have to hold the actual player deposits, but simply an amount equal to the total player deposits or the agreed percentage. Perhaps the most significant advantage is that the online gaming company can clearly show that unlike segregated client accounts, where it might be seen that the gaming company controls the funds, in a player protection trust a third party controls the funds representing the player deposits. This means the trustees are in control of the payments, which are made to the operating accounts of the company. However, the trustees can only control the funds that are placed into the trust and have no power to transfer funds into the trust from the company’s operating accounts. This allows gaming companies to enter new territories while making sure the gaming authorities of those jurisdictions take comfort that the player deposits are held completely independently of the gaming company. This also means gaming regulators can see that they can influence the behaviour of the gaming company by ensuring that appropriate language is included in the trust document, for example by including express provisions setting out what is to happen if a trigger event occurs (see below). The way the basic player protection trust operates is as follows: the e-gaming company will initially settle the agreed liability amount into the trust once it goes live (e.g. 101 per cent of the player deposit amount). Once the e-gaming company has gone live, the player liability will change every day and the gaming company reports to the trustees detailing the current liability on a daily basis. The trustee transfers any excess to the gaming company’s operating account and, in return, should there be a deficit, the trustees will ask the company to make a transfer to ensure that the difference is covered.


WWW.STEPJOURNAL.ORG This means that there are potentially


several daily transactions, so, to ensure smooth administration, it is beneficial for the trust’s bank account to be held with the same bank as the gaming company’s, allowing funds to be credited to either account at short notice. This also minimises the effect on the company’s day-to-day running and cash flow. The trust deed will normally contain provisions


detailing the impact of a trigger event. A trigger event would normally include the following: • A material breach of reporting by the gaming company.


• The trustee being notified by a licensing authority (usually defined) of a revocation or sanction of a licence.


• The gaming company ceasing to carry on business. • The gaming company failing to honour cashout requests (the proportion can be flexible).


• The gaming company being reorganised. Depending on the jurisdiction of the licensing gaming authority, the transfer of funds may require permission from the regulator before a payment is made. In most cases, however, this applies only when the amount being transferred equals a significant proportion of the trust’s value. One can expect the requirement for the


protection of player money to be multi- jurisdictional, depending on the country in which the gaming company is providing services, i.e. this is not necessarily only a requirement of the jurisdiction out of which the gaming company operates. A trust provides a simple and neat solution that many licensing authorities recognise, including civil-law countries that, historically, may not have recognised the trust concept. In summary, the player protection trust, in addition to satisfying the gaming regulatory body (in the Isle of Man and potentially elsewhere), also ensures that funds are held independently of the gaming company. The Isle of Man has built considerable expertise and experience in dealing with online gaming, but perhaps an area that has not had sufficient focus is how trusts can be used in the gaming industry. The player protection trust is an integral tool in ensuring the continued success of the e-gaming sector.


ISLE OF MAN


CAPITAL: DOUGLAS POPULATION: 85,421 AREA: 572 KM2


APRIL 2013 63


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84