This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
DR DANIEL LEHMANN TEP IS A PARTNER AT RÖLFSPARTNER IN MUNICH


GLOBAL NEWS AND VIEWS Civil-law column


Holes in my cheese


Dr Daniel Lehmann compares the dairy and legal products of Germany and Switzerland


T


he neighbouring countries Switzerland and Germany have a long tradition of mutual cultural and economic exchange. The Swiss often attracted admiration from


their German neighbours, not only for their delicious chocolate and cheese but also – at least among German trust and estate practitioners – for ratifying the Hague Convention on Trusts. In this respect, in 2007 the Swiss followed the example of Italy, which had already ratifi ed the Convention in 1989. With regard to cheese, many Germans were particularly impressed by the fact that Swiss Emmental cheese has holes in it. In 1928, the German journalist and author Kurt Tucholsky wrote a piece elaborating on where the holes in Swiss cheese come from. Even today, many German children learn in primary schools how the Swiss intubate holes into their cheese. This has evolved to the German fi gure of speech that something, in particular a legal provision, is ‘as holey as Swiss cheese’, meaning that a rule has many loopholes. As an outside observer, one may think that the decision of the Swiss Federal Tribunal of 26 April 2012 constitutes a loophole in the recognition of trusts in Switzerland. The decision resulted from a preliminary hearing in a divorce case between two Russians domiciled in Geneva. In 2005, the husband settled a Cypriot discretionary trust into which he transferred assets of signifi cant value shortly after his wife had refused to enter into a postnuptial agreement. The court approved of seizure orders into trust assets securing the wife’s claims against her husband, in eff ect treating the trust assets like assets held by the husband directly. The decision on the merits is still outstanding. In Germany, by contrast, there is no


move to ratify the Hague Convention on Trusts. Consequently, no German-situated asset may be transferred to a trust without


WWW.STEPJOURNAL.ORG


interposition of a foreign holding company. A recent decision of the Kammergericht, the upper regional court in Berlin, shows how practitioners in a civil-law jurisdiction not recognising common-law trusts do their best to deal with them: the decision of 3 April 2012 (ZEV 2012, 594) related to a discretionary testamentary trust settled by a testator domiciled in Colorado who possessed – among other things, hopefully – a 0.0625 per cent ownership interest in a piece of German real estate. In Germany, all owners of real estate are registered in the land registry. The transfer of title from the decedent to the new owner needs to be registered. However, the registry does not accept common-law trusts as owners. Consequently, the question of whom to register arose. The Kammergericht sought the structure under German law that most closely resembled the testamentary trust in the case at hand, and held that the benefi ciaries of the trust should be registered as new owners. The trustee who holds the legal title only has a role comparable to an executor under German succession law and should not be registered. From a German perspective, this is an acceptable result. Yet the mechanics of


the changes in the land registry deserve a closer look: unlike common-law jurisdictions, German law does not provide for probate. Instead, the estate vests with the heirs directly and automatically by operation of the law. It is up to them to administer the estate. To prove their entitlement to dispose of estate assets and to get registered as new owners in the land registry, heirs usually use a certifi cate of inheritance (Erbschein) issued by a German court. In the case of the Colorado testamentary trust, a German Erbschein names only the trust benefi ciaries as heirs of the decedent, without mentioning the trust. Traditionally, the Swiss recognise a German Erbschein. If the Erbschein in the case decided by the Kammergericht was recognised in Switzerland, this would lead to the irritating result that in Switzerland the trust benefi ciaries were to be regarded as owners of the assets of the estate even though, as it is subject to the Hague Convention, Switzerland is obliged to recognise the trust, i.e. the ownership of the trustee. The European cheese is likely to develop


another unwelcome hole when, from 2015, the EU Succession Regulation will become applicable. The EU Succession Regulation does not apply to testamentary trusts (Art 1(j)). If a testator residing in a participating member state, e.g. Italy, settles a testamentary trust, the courts in Italy will have exclusive jurisdiction on the issuance of a European certifi cate of succession (Art 64). If the certifi cate issued in Italy names the trustee, in that capacity, as title-holder, the German land registry will not be able to accept this. A German certifi cate of inheritance, however, will not be available because the Italian courts will have exclusive jurisdiction. Luckily, the cheese delivered to testators in Switzerland, the UK, the US or other jurisdictions not participating in the regulation will be free of holes because in their cases the subsidiary competence of German courts subject to Art 10 of the regulation will be available. Enjoy!


APRIL 2013 19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84