ROYAL APPOINTMENT: The Queen Elizabeth Prize
The first step towards encouraging more young people to take up careers in engineering, says Lord Browne
john browne
President of the Royal Academy of Engineering
The Queen Elizabeth Prize will celebrate all areas of engineering, from televisions to telescopes.
T Education
Degree in physics from Cambridge University MS in business from Stanford University, California Career
Career
1966 Joined BP as a university apprentice
1984 Became group treasurer and chief executive of BP Finance International
1989 Promoted to managing director and chief executive officer of BP Exploration
1991 Joined BP’s board as managing director
1995 Appointed chief exective 2001 Became a life peer
2006 Appointed president of the Royal Academy of Engineering
2007 Takes early retirement from BP
2010 Released Browne report on higher-education funding
2011 Appointed chair of Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering
34 actionetwork
his is not yet another article saying that engineering in the UK is ‘in crisis’. That term has been so chronically overused in
the last 12 months that it has virtually lost its meaning. In fact, the numbers of young people deciding to study engineering and technology in the UK has at last slowly started to climb. But they still account for only around six percent
of the entire student population. There is clearly something wrong when engi-
neering companies in the UK are struggling to fill job vacancies at a time when more than a million young people are out of work. Contrast this with the scene in India and China, which produce half a million engineers between them, every year. Economically, the importance of engineering
cannot bee overstated. In 2009, UK industry con- tributed 21 per cent of the country’s GDP, but that figure had declined from 34 per cent in 1990 – according to the United Nations conference on Trade and development statistics.
Trend Most other developed economies have experi-
enced a contraction of their industrial sectors, but even so, we are well behind the developed econo- my average of 24 per cent. And the trend is still heading down. Compare that with the emerging economies and you see our challenge. India derives 28 per cent of its GDP from indus-
try and China 48 per cent, and the trend in both countries is sharply up. That is why I am calling for up to two million
engineers to be produced from the UK economy to help cure the often discussed weakness of the UK in turning ideas into clobal commercial successes. The UK economy needs engineering in order to remain competitive in an increasingly global econ- omy. The UK has a world-class knowledge base
and we hope that the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering will re-invigorate interest and passion in engineering what will make the most of what we already have and build on it. This country needs an industrial strategy to set it back on the path to economic growth. We, the engineering profession, with the support of government, must excite young people to join us in re-engineering the economy. We must encourage schools to present engineer- ing as an aspirational career. We must give stu- dents a financial reason to choose engineering at university – more scholarships and fast-track courses, and guaranteed work placements.
‘I am calling for up to two million engineers
to be produced to help turn UK ideas into global successes
Today we’re taking the first step along that road. ’
We’re inviting nominations for a new kind of inter- national engineering prize – one that will consider achievements in all areas from fashion to fusion and from telescopes to televisions. The aim of the Queen Elizabeth Prize is two-fold.
It will celebrate the world’s greatest modern engi- neering achievements, bestowing £1m on the win- ner, while proving to young people just how diverse, how creative, how relevant and important engineer - ing really is. This is not simply a prize. This is a recognition of
everything that engineering is and everything that engineering can will become. In this task, we must not fail – the economic future of the UK depends upon it.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44