This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Wednesday 11 April 2012 at 09:30 - 11:30 LAW, CRIME AND RIGHTS


Waites, M. Global Queer Politics and Human Rights: Towards a More Sociological Analysis


The use of human rights discourses by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender movements has contributed to developments such as South Africa’s resolution addressing discrimination and violence faced in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity, endorsed at the UN Human Rights Council on 17 June 2011.


It has also


contributed to positive developments in many states, such as the partial decriminalisation of same-sex sexual behavior in India in 2009.


nationalisms and religious beliefs.


Yet in many other states there remains resistance, often entwined with post-colonial National empirical research on LGBT issues is increasing, but at an


international level there remains scope for a more developed sociological interpretation of how human rights claims are operating, relating dynamics within states to transnational processes. In this paper I will seek to develop the international sociological analysis of sexual orientation, gender identity and human rights by drawing together themes from the sociology of human rights and queer theory with national empirical case studies in recent international collections, and with primary research on specific states (eg. India and UK). I will attempt to move beyond existing global analyses through a focus on distinguishing between decriminalisation struggles and broader human rights struggles. Such distinctions rarely receive sustained attention in theoretical conceptualisations of the global contestation of sexual orientation and gender identity. Relative to accounts of homonationalism and human rights discourses emerging from cultural studies, the sociology of human rights might yield a more multi-leveled analysis.


Karapehlivan Senel, F. Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey Combining Different Levels of Analysis for the Realisation of the Right to Education


This paper aims to contribute to the emerging field of sociology of human rights by exploring the gap in formal recognition and substantive enjoyment of the right to education and to discuss the contributions of a sociological analysis for the realisation of this right. It will be argued that we need to supplement the legal theory and normative principles of the right to education with sociological theories of education and social policy. Moreover it is also necessary to change the way we study and analyse the right to education by looking at not only the macro level and provision side of it, but also by looking at the micro level and enjoyment side of the right to education. In other words we need to look at the relationships between global, national and local levels and to combine different levels of analysis in order to have a better understanding of the social reality we are studying. The specific concern of this paper is the introduction of market relations into primary education and their implications on the right to education in Turkey. In this paper, it will be argued that the restructuring of state-education relationships has had implications on the right to education in Turkey by creating new forms of inequalities in education. It will focus on the consequences of macro polices in micro level, namely on individual schools, teachers, parents and students by drawing on the micro level qualitative research conducted in two primary schools in Ankara.


Booker, M. University of Edinburgh


State-building Processes under the Microscope: What 1830s Corruption Discourses Tell Us about the Modern State


With the Election Reform Act of 1832 and the Municipal Corporations Act of 1835, the 1830s provide important switch points for the development of measures against political corruption in Britain. This presentation analyses everyday newspaper discourses on corruption in the 1830s, and shows how the discourses were connected to different aspects of (macro-historical) state-building processes. It starts with a short quantitative assessment of the frequency of corruption discourses in British newspapers, using the recently published British Library 19th century newspaper database. This new data confirms that growing corruption debates in the early 1830s preceded anti- corruption legislation. This could suggest that these important steps in the institutionalisation of the modern state were influenced by public, and more precisely, newspaper pressure. A second, qualitative step sheds more light on this assumed connection. Selected newspaper articles are analysed as to why they were critical of what kind of corruption and what aspects they were especially critical of. This is then related to the publication itself, in particular the respective ownership, and its political orientation. The analysis reveals a number of the cleavages inherent in statebuilding processes, among others new elites vs. old elites, centre vs. periphery and the institutionalisation of the state bureaucracy vs. resistance against it, both from sections of the ruling elites and the landed elites. Combining the findings from both quantitative and qualitative analysis thus offers detailed insights into how exactly some state-building processes unfolded in Britain.


59


ROGER STEVENS 04 University of Glasgow


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288  |  Page 289  |  Page 290  |  Page 291  |  Page 292  |  Page 293  |  Page 294  |  Page 295  |  Page 296  |  Page 297  |  Page 298  |  Page 299  |  Page 300  |  Page 301  |  Page 302  |  Page 303  |  Page 304  |  Page 305  |  Page 306  |  Page 307  |  Page 308  |  Page 309  |  Page 310  |  Page 311  |  Page 312  |  Page 313  |  Page 314  |  Page 315  |  Page 316  |  Page 317  |  Page 318  |  Page 319  |  Page 320  |  Page 321  |  Page 322  |  Page 323  |  Page 324  |  Page 325  |  Page 326  |  Page 327  |  Page 328  |  Page 329  |  Page 330  |  Page 331  |  Page 332  |  Page 333  |  Page 334  |  Page 335  |  Page 336  |  Page 337  |  Page 338  |  Page 339  |  Page 340