Friday 13 April 2012 at 09:00 - 10:30 FAMILIES, RELATIONSHIPS,
LIFECOURSE Cicek, Z., Mender, M.
Sociological Analysis of Divorce Case: An Applied Study in Denizli
Divorce, by common definition, is termination of union of marriage legally. Sociologically, divorce points the breakup union of marriage. The divorce phenomenon requires a multi-dimensional analysis regarding the level of social development, the increase in the level of welfare and income, woman’s participation in labour force, becoming aware of social rights, man-woman equality policies, forms of religious beliefs, characteristics of urban and rural structures, changes in family structure.
The subject of this paper is to analyze 'reasons, effects and results' of the divorce phenomenon on social and individual level in Denizli case within the gender perspective. In the study, the reasons, effects and results of the divorce phenomenon will be analyzed in macro (individual-institutions relations) and micro (reletions between the individuals and between the individual and groups) levels in the context of socio-culture values and norms, social status and roles, attitudes and behaviours. The reasons why Denizli/divorces in Denizli has been chosen as the study space is that Denizli has the highest rate of divorce (0.63 per mille) in Turkey.
In Turkey, the existing studies concerning the divorce generally tend to put forward the effects of divorce on children or the psychological and psychiatrics problems of the divorce woman and man, adaptation in the divorce period and their adaptation skills. The
insufficient. In the West, the rich literature concerning the social, cultural and economic effects and results of the divorce on woman and man
number of studies which treat the issue sociologically are, however, or differing patterns of experience is noteworthy. Apart from treating the divorce
phenomenon in gender perspectives makes the proposed Project unique according to the contribution that it will be provide fort he literature.
Ramdom sampling technique will be used to determined the sample which will include 154 persons which is believed to provide representation ability. For the sample, the number of the divorced subjects in 2009, 2010, 2011 to be representative proportional layered sample technique will be used by considering the ratio of each year to total of three years. In the research, survey technique and interview will be used to get the data. The range of the sample group will include above 18 considering younger marriage age in Turkey.
Abu Amara, N., Hamel, C., Guiné, A. INED -National Institute for Demographic Studies
Matrimonial Changing Norms in the Context of Migration in France: Revisiting Consent and Coercion in Marriage-related Decision
How to define constraint in marriage-related decisions when cultural transmission of values undergoes tension between individual and collective norms?
This paper is based on 44 interviews with women and men, immigrant and descendents of immigrants, who initially participated in the quantitative survey Trajectories and Origins (INED and INSEE, 2009) concerning discriminations in France. Those who reported that they did not have the initiative of their marriage were interviewed again for a qualitative survey on consent and coercion to marriage.
The presentation examines the evolution of matrimonial norms using a critical approach of notions such as consent and coercion to marriage.
The interviews reveal the existence of different levels of constraint to marriage, as a result of family, social or administrative pressures. The diversity of situations can account for the existence of a continuum of social and family pressures. This research reveals, in particular, that coercion is experienced differently according to gender, origin, and socioeconomic resources. It also shows the vulnerability of some women in the migratory path: the lack of economic and symbolic resources (education, language proficiency) and the lack of networks of relationships (friendships or family), reinforces their exposure to spousal violence, while they use different strategies of resistance.
ROUNDTABLE 3, SPORTS HALL 2 Pamukkale University
244
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260 |
Page 261 |
Page 262 |
Page 263 |
Page 264 |
Page 265 |
Page 266 |
Page 267 |
Page 268 |
Page 269 |
Page 270 |
Page 271 |
Page 272 |
Page 273 |
Page 274 |
Page 275 |
Page 276 |
Page 277 |
Page 278 |
Page 279 |
Page 280 |
Page 281 |
Page 282 |
Page 283 |
Page 284 |
Page 285 |
Page 286 |
Page 287 |
Page 288 |
Page 289 |
Page 290 |
Page 291 |
Page 292 |
Page 293 |
Page 294 |
Page 295 |
Page 296 |
Page 297 |
Page 298 |
Page 299 |
Page 300 |
Page 301 |
Page 302 |
Page 303 |
Page 304 |
Page 305 |
Page 306 |
Page 307 |
Page 308 |
Page 309 |
Page 310 |
Page 311 |
Page 312 |
Page 313 |
Page 314 |
Page 315 |
Page 316 |
Page 317 |
Page 318 |
Page 319 |
Page 320 |
Page 321 |
Page 322 |
Page 323 |
Page 324 |
Page 325 |
Page 326 |
Page 327 |
Page 328 |
Page 329 |
Page 330 |
Page 331 |
Page 332 |
Page 333 |
Page 334 |
Page 335 |
Page 336 |
Page 337 |
Page 338 |
Page 339 |
Page 340