This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FEATURE


Louise Naughton Reporter, Nursing in Practice


Implanting fear: cosmetic surgery


complications in primary care What happens when problems arise following private cosmetic procedures, and who should take responsibility?


W


hen cosmetic surgery goes wrong, it can land on the doorstep of primary care, and practice nurses can be faced with frightened patients with nowhere to turn. Freedom of information requests sent by Nursing in


Practice to all 151 primary care trusts (PCTs) in England showed just how little we know about how many patients with botched cosmetic surgery walk through the doors of GP surgeries. None of the PCTs were able to generate any indication of the burden


of cosmetic surgery on general practice as all primary care consulta- tions are confidential and as such, this is not data they collect. The recent French-made Poly Implant Prothese (PIP) scandal


has shown how quickly an overwhelming reliance on primary care health professionals to step in and pick up the pieces of private cosmetic work can manifest itself. Women all over the UK were thrown into panic when, in 2010,


the French authorities banned PIP implants made with low-grade silicone – developed to fill mattresses, among other uses,– fearing they could rupture and leak. An estimated 8,000 women have breast implant surgery in the


UK every year. More than 4,500 of the possible 47,000 women fitted with PIP


implants in the UK have been referred to the NHS so far, according to figures released by the Department of Health in March. Such women had implants privately fitted by clinics that have


refused treatment or no longer exist. Over 2,170 women have had their implants scanned to check


for a rupture, yet only 224 have decided to go under the knife once again to have them removed. An expert group, commissioned by the government and led by


NHS Medical Director Professor Sir Bruce Keough, has already discounted a cancer link with ruptured PIP implants and the results of further investigations are expected to be published in May this year.


The NHS in England did use the PIP implants for reconstructive


surgery but only in a small number of patients. Of the 747 women fitted with PIP implants through the NHS, 98 have made the decision to remove them. It is not known whether such women have had their implants replaced. Not only is NHS England helping its own patients anxious about


their PIP implants, it is acting as a last resort for women with privately-fitted PIP implants. Only those with a medical need, such as distress or rupturing of the implant, or those who are refused treatment from their original surgeon, will have the implants removed by the NHS but not replaced. The NHS in Northern Ireland has taken a similar line to its


English counterpart, but said it will remove and replace implants inserted by the NHS for health reasons. However, the NHS in Wales has committed to replacing PIP


implants fitted both by the NHS and private providers where there is a medical need. A statement from NHS Scotland to NiP confirmed PIP implants


were not used by the NHS in Scotland but were used by the private healthcare sector. Therefore Scottish officials currently do not hold any information


on the number of implants which have ruptured or need removal. A survey of NiP readers has shown 87.8% of you believe the


NHS should fund the removal of PIP implants even if there is no clinical need. Responses were more diverse when asked whether the NHS


should go further and fund the replacement of PIP implants when a medical need is shown. Almost 20% of you believed the NHS should cover the costs for


both the removal and replacement of the sub-grade implants, with 28.6% agreeing on the basis of the woman paying for the operation out of her own pocket. However, 16.7% agreed with the government in preventing the


taxpayer from footing the bill. The largest portion of you (41.9%) agreed the NHS should fund


18 Nursing in Practice March/April 2012


www.nursinginpractice.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84