This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Let us look at the process by which this collective heritage came into being. The economic and demographic forces that catapulted seventeenth century Barbados into becoming “the richest spote of ground in the worlde” were marshalled by the early success this island enjoyed in the sugar industry. Sugar, even now in marked retreat, created the Barbados we know today. The wealth generated by the industry and the resident nature of the planter class, as opposed to the marked absenteeism of the other islands, created an embarrassment of monumental heritage. Over seven hundred plantations with their individual great houses with their furniture, over five hundred sugar wind mills and later, nineteenth century steam driven factories, over forty forts to defend this wealth, and the institutional infrastructure created to service the needs of the privileged section of the population… churches and schools.

Though a great deal has been lost, much still survives, ranging from a pristine state of preservation to one of gross neglect. There are over two hundred plantation houses, many lived in, some awaiting a generous purchaser to resurrect them, like the proverbial Phoenix from the ashes. There are still over a hundred mills standing, though only one, Morgan Lewis mill, a Barbados National Trust property, still has its sails and machinery intact and still grinds sugar cane. The many forts that dotted the island’s west and south coasts have now largely disappeared, but the Garrison, born out of the late eighteenth century conflict for world supremacy between Britain and France, still survives, the largest and best preserved of Britain’s overseas military garrisons. The parish churches, with the stained glass windows and their profusion of centuries old funerary architecture still survive, playing their traditional role of administering to the spiritual needs of the Barbadian population.

With its sugar export economy, the port of Bridgetown grew rapidly in the seventeenth century, forming the tripartite grouping of London, Boston and Bridgetown that dominated the British North Atlantic trading system. Unplanned, much like an English market town of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries,

Bridgetown grew and

expanded. Despite the various fires and occasional hurricanes that affected it, some of the seventeenth century buildings such as the Dutch gabled Nicholls building survive, as well as a larger number of eighteenth century structures, such as St Michael’s Cathedral, the Masonic Lodge, the Old Town Hall and the Retreat located within the Harrison College compound. The bulk of Bridgetown is of nineteenth century provenance, many of the original structures masked by twentieth century facades. Out of the wealth of Bridgetown and the strategic geographic location of Barbados, came as noted, the magnificent Garrison, with almost one hundred buildings standing, most of which are still

occupied and hence, in relatively good condition, as opposed to the shells of military endeavours which dot the Caribbean islands.

Of what significance then is this UNESCO inscription. In short, if properly handled, it can be a catalyst for the revitalisation of Bridgetown. This will benefit Barbadians and at the same time, help in the creation of niche endeavours which will stimulate tourism and enhance hard currency inflows into our island. Tourism is a competitive enterprise. A look at our Caribbean neighbours will show the degree to which they have incorporated heritage into their marketing. Willemstad, Curacao is but one such example. We should also look at the work now being done in Falmouth, Jamaica. That late eighteenth century town is being resurrected as I write. Further afield, one only has to visit Charleston, South Carolina to appreciate the benefits that can accrue from a dedicated and coordinated approach to heritage conservation and preservation.

A valid question, and one that is frequently asked is, to what degree does this monumental heritage reflect the patrimony of the enslaved as opposed to the free population? This question is of course related to the broader issue of “whose heritage?” One, in answering this question, should recognise that slaves were not entirely passive or robot like individuals, to be manipulated by their owners. They had personas, emotions, creativity and skills. This creativity and the numerous skills that accompanied it, be they cabinetry, masonry, carpentry, are reflected in the numerous historic structures which dot Bridgetown, most of them built by enslaved master craftsmen or their descendants.

This present day generation has inherited a valuable patrimony. We will add to it for future generations

but we also need to cherish and hold onto what we have been bequeathed. This is where skillful management comes into play. This must involve on going education as to the value of heritage and the possibilities of adaptive reusage. In this regard, the power brokers, be they the economic elites or government technocrats need to be constantly monitored and advised, because it is they above all other groups in our society who have been responsible for the greater part of the destruction of our material culture and our physical landscape which has taken place over the last fifty years.

Change is a constant in the human saga. It is inevitable. But holding on to the signposts of the past, the collective heritage of our endeavours, is equally important. Without these sign posts, we are lost, adrift on a boundless, timeless sea, with no mastery or sense of direction.

Dr. Karl Watson President Barbados National Trust

Karl Watson is a retired Senior Lecturer in the Department of History at UWI Cave Hill Campus. He is author of several books and articles, including Barbados the Civilised Island, Barbados First, Not For Wages Alone (with Patrick Bryan), The White Minority in the Caribbean (with Howard Johnson) and Old Doll, Matriarch of Newton Plantation. He is President of the Barbados National Trust, Chairman of

the Barbados/Carolinas

Deputy Chairman of the Bush Hill Tourism Trust Inc. and Editor of the Journal of the Barbados Museum and Historical Society.



Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124