is 2012 the year to try ACre?
ByMATT reese If farmers have not already, it is time
to think about the enrolling in the Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) Program. “We’re trying to talk to crop farmers
now because when they get out to April and May, they will be busy,” said Chris Hurt, a Purdue University econo- mist. “Sign up has to be by June 1 at the FSA office.” Hurt said this might be the year for
farmers to put some extra thought into ACRE. “It is designed to float up and down
as a safety net for the farmer. We have high prices now — the 2010 crop had record high prices for corn and beans. The 2011 crops beat those with new records. We now have two years of record high prices, which makes that revenue guarantee in ACRE very high,” Hurt said. “A second reason is that 2012 is the last year for ACRE under the farm program we have now. Some producers didn’t like the idea of losing 20% of their direct payments for the year they signed up and every subsequent year. This is the last year for ACRE program left at this point, so it is very low cost. There is going to be a lot of groaning out there — ‘I didn’t understand that the first time and now you want me to go back and look at that again.’ Yes. You need to be ready to sign up by June 1 because ACRE offers a huge amount of downside protection.” In looking at the ACRE track record,
Chris Bruynis, assistant professor and Ohio State University Extension Educator, said that ACRE has done what it was intended to do. “Looking back, the question is, ‘Was it
a good decision for those farmers that elected in previously?’ There are many ways to answer that question. From a risk management perspective, the answer is yes. The downside revenue protection that was provided was worth the approximate $4 per acre in reduced direct payments,” Bruynis said. “From a cash flow perspective, the answer is mostly no, except under certain circum- stances, because the ACRE payments for wheat in 2009 and 2010 were not enough to offset the reduction in direct pay- ments. Farmers are now into the fourth year and have the final opportunity to elect into ACRE provision.” Bruynis agrees that ACRE could very
well be the right fit for some farmers in Ohio this season based on the strong pro- tection it will offer. “Examining the numbers and
price/yield assumptions, farmers can speculate on the probability of an ACRE payment being triggered in 2012 and if ACRE might be a good choice for them,” he said. “The guarantee price for 2012 will be the two-year average U.S. cash price from the marketing years for the 2010 and 2011 crops. Using the 2010 actual prices plus the USDA estimated price from January 31, 2012 for the 2011 crops, the 2012 ACRE price guarantee can be calculated.” Bruynis estimates the price guarantee for 2012 corn to be $5.69 per acre and
Ohio’s Country Journal •
ocj.com • Mid-March 2012 • Crops 19
2012 soybeans to be $11.50 per acre. “Since ACRE is a revenue protection
program, price is only half of the equation in determining the 2012 ACRE revenue guarantee,” he said. “The second half of the equation is the five- year Olympic average yield for each crop respectively.”
The Olympic average yields are 157
bushels per acre for corn, 48 bushels per acre for soybeans and 63 bushels per acre for wheat. With these average yields, the estimated 2012 Ohio ACRE revenue guarantee will be calculated by multiplying the Ohio Olympic average yield by the U.S. average cash price and
ACRE’s 90% coverage level. In addition, there is a 10% range above or below the previous year’s guarantee built into the ACRE program. This 10% cup and cap will come into effect for all three major crops in Ohio if these forecasted num- bers hold true.
continued on page 20
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40