This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FOCUS IT REFRESH


Issue 7, Dec 09/Jan 10


IT REFRESH – CLEAN SLATE THINKING


A holistic approach to refresh parameters is needed so variables such as economics, energy, operations and Total Cost of Ownership can be evaluated fairly. DLB Associates conducts an evaluation.


predictable span of 3-4 years. Alternately, the infrastructure supporting that same IT equipment can typically have a lifespan of 15-25 years, or even longer. Structured in terms of lifecycles, the IT equipment will see a minimum of 3-5 lifetimes while connected to a predominantly unchanging infrastructure.


A


The idea of equipment refreshes within the data center environment is relatively well understood by those in the IT field. When considering the scope of the refresh activity, it may be convenient to think of IT refreshes as having a clear beginning and ending. Unfortunately, it is actually more representative to think of them in terms of both minor and major events.


In most data centers, there is an almost continuous series of incremental (minor) upgrades that occur while opportunities for significant changes to the supporting infrastructure are consequently limited. It is during the more significant (major) upgrades where it makes sense to plan ahead and exploit scenarios that may be presented.


It is easy to fall into the trap of thinking that infrastructure supporting an IT installation is relatively static. While that outlook is true from the macro view, it is essential to consider the complete spectrum of opportunities that exist when faced with a major IT refresh.


The question to ask is, “What would I do if…?” This more holistic approach helps to remove artificial barriers erected by inhibited or constrained baseline assumptions. The development of viable options can help to qualify an organisation’s requirements for different infrastructure approaches.


In Figure 1, options have been limited to those addressing the cooling system but can


40 www.datacenterdynamics.com


fundamental precept of technology is that advances will quickly make today’s IT equipment obsolete within a relatively


Options overview, or ‘What would you do if?’ Topic


Cooling System Depreciation


Capital Cost Schedule


Energy Usage Cost


Operations & Maintenance Cost Carbon impact / Use


TCO - Total Cost of Ownership


Rating - 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) Option 1


Reuse Existing 50%


1 1 5 5 5 5


Option 2


Adapt Existing About 50%


3 3 3 3 3 3


Option 3


TCO Optimised Not Applicable


5 5 1 1 1 1


Figure 1: Cooling system options help qualify an organisation’s requirements for different approaches


In most data centers, there is an almost continuous series of incremental (minor) upgrades that occur while opportunities for significant changes to the supporting infrastructure are consequently limited


easily be adapted to encompass additional infrastructure elements, such as emergency power, control systems or lighting.


In this example, by removing the limitation of a nearly unchanged infrastructure, a gradually increasing scale of change and adaptation is presented.


Using example metrics such as first cost, schedule or carbon impact, a more holistic


approach can be used to gauge an organisation’s appetite for infrastructure adaptations.


One of the advantages of the IT refresh is that it may be possible to access historical data or trends of IT equipment utilisation. This data, in whatever forms it can be characterised, can be an invaluable tool for evaluating options as it can influence data points on energy consumption, operations manpower, seasonal profiles and a host of other possibilities.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60